A Model of Risk Information Disclosures in Non-Financial Corporate Reports of Socially Responsible Energy Companies in Poland

Abstract

Risk management is critical for corporate finance management systems, in addition to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development (SD) programs. Stakeholders need risk information to make informed judgments as to their involvement. No studies exist to date concerning disclosure of non-financial and financial risks in corporate annual statements and Polish strategic sector company reports. The authors sought to determine whether energy companies disclosed risks in non-financial annual reports in 2011–2020 (e.g., CSR, integrated, and board activity reports), and whether one can assess threats, including business activity risks and SD, based on these reports. We assessed the reports of all large Polish energy companies on a three- and five-degree scale to develop a model for risk information disclosures. We have three key empirical findings. Only half the analysed companies disclose annual financial data, threats, and risks. Less than half have implemented and operate enterprise risk management systems. The current ‘soft’ regulatory solutions give energy companies appreciable risk disclosure options, which often is counterproductive. We suggest developing a single integrated European Union (EU) regulation (e.g., directives, standards, or official principles) for non-financial risk disclosures. Our model classifies Polish energy company risks to business activity operations and risk management systems. Other sectors can use this universal model. Our results constitute progress in identifying company risks and may encourage continuing studies of other energy companies, especially in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), which should be intensively developed. Research should also occur in other strategic sectors.

ESG Information Disclosure of Listed Companies Based on Entropy Weight Algorithm Under the Background of Double Carbon

“…From the perspective of corporate reputation, Allcott and Sweeney (2017) found that better environmental performance can allow a company to consider the corresponding rights and interests of stakeholders, enhancing their trust in the enterprise and leading to follow-up cooperation, thus improving the enterprise's operating efficiency. Szczepankiewicz et al (2022) put forward the view of negative correlation based on the idea that enhancing an enterprise's environmental report would increase the company's value.…”

ESG Assessment from the Perspective of the Management Board and Trade Unions on the Example of the Opole Power Plant

“…Companies focus on presenting awards and other facts that build trust and image (implemented quality systems, anti-corruption practices, adherence to codes of ethics, investment projects, good financial performance, etc.). As a result of stakeholder pressure, the quality of annual reports is expected to improve [99].…”

Evolution of Energy Companies’ Non-Financial Disclosures: A Model of Non-Financial Reports in the Energy Sector

“…The concept of CSRRs, or IRs, is very closely related to the dialogue between the reporting entity and its stockholders, shareholders, potential investors, and other stakeholder groups. Disclosures related to that dialogue are crucial in the context of assessing the quality of CSRRs and IRs [48][49][50][51][52].…”

“…Importantly, however, full-scale audit is not required in the case of non-financial reports. Therefore, subjecting non-financial data to a full-scale audit is a choice rather than a necessity, and depends on the decision of the entity's management [15,[50][51][52]. In most cases, reports are reviewed in order to ascertain (in the form of a statement) whether non-financial data have been disclosed.…”

“…The environmental management system is part of the overall QMS in the organization. Its goal is to supervise and assess the environmental impact of the organization's activities [50,52]. It can be considered as a set of tools that support the implementation of the environmental policy and consequently mitigate the negative environmental impacts in a manner that most accurately meets the needs of the organization and the environment.…”