1988
DOI: 10.1080/01431168808954881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of satellite radar altimeter return from ice sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in a mixed return signal consisting of surface reflection and volume reflection (Ridley and Partington, 1988). Here, the selection of an appropriate retracking algorithm is essential.…”
Section: Schröder Et Al: Validation Of Satellite Altimetry By Kinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a mixed return signal consisting of surface reflection and volume reflection (Ridley and Partington, 1988). Here, the selection of an appropriate retracking algorithm is essential.…”
Section: Schröder Et Al: Validation Of Satellite Altimetry By Kinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…grain size, accumulation rate) (Ridley & Partington, 1988). Actually, time series of these parameters allow a survey of grain size through estimates of penetration depth (Legr6sy and R6my, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nghiem et al (2005) found penetration depths to exceed 1 m for Ku-band data over Greenland, while Forsberg et al (2002), for C-band data, found 15-20 m in the dry accumulation zone near the Geikie Plateau, which decreased to zero towards lower altitudes. Such errors are not found in LA as the echoes reflect directly off the surface (Brenner et al 1983(Brenner et al , 2007Ridley and Partington 1988;Bamber 1994). This explains the findings by Brenner et al (2007) in a comparison of ICESat and Envisat surface elevations over Greenland and Antarctica: They found a laser elevation precision of 14 -50 cm depending on the surface slope, and elevation differences ranging from 9 ± 52 cm for slopes less than 0.1 • to 2.7 ± 26 m for slopes up to 0.9 • .…”
Section: Surface Elevation Change Studies From Altimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%