1973
DOI: 10.1068/a050231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Students' Daily Activity Patterns

Abstract: A model is described whose purpose is to predict the distribution of students in different activities and locations during the course of a typical day, depending on the effective restrictions imposed by the spatial distribution of buildings and sites, and by administrative and social constraints on the timing of activities. The model is of an entropy-maximising type; the data against which it is tested are drawn from time budget surveys made in two universities, using diary methods. A series of exploratory exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Space-Time Budget Space-time budgets were initially developed to assist research on travel, tourism and urban planning (see, for example, Anderson 1971;Tomlinson et al 1973;Forer and Kivell 1981;Janelle et al 1988;Fenell 1996;Mey and Heide 1997). Space-time budget methodology built upon earlier time budgets (or time diaries), which are useful for analysing the timing, sequence and frequency of events (see Pentland et al 1999) but fail to address the spatial dimensions of activity patterns (Hanson and Hanson 1980).…”
Section: The Peterborough Community Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Space-Time Budget Space-time budgets were initially developed to assist research on travel, tourism and urban planning (see, for example, Anderson 1971;Tomlinson et al 1973;Forer and Kivell 1981;Janelle et al 1988;Fenell 1996;Mey and Heide 1997). Space-time budget methodology built upon earlier time budgets (or time diaries), which are useful for analysing the timing, sequence and frequency of events (see Pentland et al 1999) but fail to address the spatial dimensions of activity patterns (Hanson and Hanson 1980).…”
Section: The Peterborough Community Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the university, as a semiclosed system covering a small geographical space, provides a useful basis for model development and evaluation. Secondly, students live within a limited space with a semipredictable daily activity pattern (especially for first-year undergraduate students, as most of their study activities involve taking lectures which are known) (Huisman and Forer, 1998;Tomlinson et al, 1973), and have relatively little interaction with the outer world (weekends are neglected). Thirdly, age structure need not be considered, and there are no births or deaths, and marginal immigration and emigration.…”
Section: Input and Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the material already mentioned, there was an (until recently unanalysed) diary collection by Mass Observation in 1937, and sample surveys by the same organisation in 1951 and 1957. There was a small survey of working-class women, carried out by Claus Moser in 1948(Population 1949, a national sample from Mark Abrams in the mid-1960s (Abrams 1969), the 1970 'Symmetrical Family' survey of couples in the London Metropolitan Region, the 1981 Scottish Leisure Survey, and a number of other surveys of special groups such as students (Tomlinson et al 1973), shiftworkers (Aubrey et al 1986), or the unemployed (Miles, 1984). And in addition, there is a long series of so-called 'viewernistener availability surveys' carried out by the Audience Research Department of the BBC (in 1938BBC (in , 1951BBC (in , 1961BBC (in , 1974BBC (in /5 and 1983.…”
Section: Time Budgets In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%