2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10644-008-9034-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of unbalanced sectorial growth with application to transition economies

Abstract: This paper studies the implications of a dynamic general equilibrium model with three production sectors, which are agriculture, industry and services. Due to the assumption of increasing returns in industry and services, our model has multiple equilibria. Two equilibria are stable: one, in which a country produces only agricultural goods and converges to a steady state, and the other, in which a country operates all three sectors and has positive unbalanced long-run growth by contracting agriculture and expan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developing models with non‐balanced growth would restore the importance of the Krusell et al (2000) capital–skill complementarity mechanism for the long‐run behaviour of the economy. This direction is worth exploring, as recent work calls into question the assumption of balanced growth; see, for example, Ramey and Francis (2006) for evidence on a temporal rise in leisure, and Mulligan (2002) and Hornstein (2004) for evidence on changes in the capital–output ratio, as well as Ngai and Pissarides (2007), Kylymnyuk et al (2007a, b) and Acemoglu and Guerrieri (2008) for evidence on and theoretical explanations of non‐balanced systematic changes in the relative importance of different production sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing models with non‐balanced growth would restore the importance of the Krusell et al (2000) capital–skill complementarity mechanism for the long‐run behaviour of the economy. This direction is worth exploring, as recent work calls into question the assumption of balanced growth; see, for example, Ramey and Francis (2006) for evidence on a temporal rise in leisure, and Mulligan (2002) and Hornstein (2004) for evidence on changes in the capital–output ratio, as well as Ngai and Pissarides (2007), Kylymnyuk et al (2007a, b) and Acemoglu and Guerrieri (2008) for evidence on and theoretical explanations of non‐balanced systematic changes in the relative importance of different production sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%