2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13041740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Waste Price in a Symbiotic Supply Chain Based on Stackelberg Algorithm

Abstract: By establishing a two-level symbiotic supply chain system consisting of one supplier and one manufacturer, we use Stackelberg method to analyze the optimal price and revenue model of supplier and manufacturer in the symbiotic supply chain under two power structures in which the supplier and manufacturer are dominant respectively, and analyze the influence of the degree of symbiosis and power structure on the model. Through comparative analysis, we find that: There is a relationship between the income level and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qiu et al used evolutionary game method to analyze the choice of battery recycling strategy of new energy vehicles in the two-level supply chain composed of original equipment manufactures and 4S stores, and found that the key factor affecting the subsidy strategy is the revenue increase rate of both sides after the subsidy [42]. Covindan et al studied the patterns of coordination among agents in a two-level closed-loop supply chain, classified them, and compared their advantages and disadvantages [43,44]. Xie et al focused on the revenue sharing contract of forward and reverse supply chains.…”
Section: Secondary Supply Chain Of Automobilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Qiu et al used evolutionary game method to analyze the choice of battery recycling strategy of new energy vehicles in the two-level supply chain composed of original equipment manufactures and 4S stores, and found that the key factor affecting the subsidy strategy is the revenue increase rate of both sides after the subsidy [42]. Covindan et al studied the patterns of coordination among agents in a two-level closed-loop supply chain, classified them, and compared their advantages and disadvantages [43,44]. Xie et al focused on the revenue sharing contract of forward and reverse supply chains.…”
Section: Secondary Supply Chain Of Automobilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption 2. According to literature [51,63], we set the market demand function as: q � a − bp + αθ + λe, where a represents the potential demand in the intelligent connected vehicle market, b represents the sensitivity coefficient of consumers to product prices, and [44,45], p represents the retail price of intelligent connected vehicles, α represents the innovation effect of products, and θ represents the innovation level of products. Referring to the research of Zerang et al [64,65], it is assumed that market demand is a linear function of price and sales effort, and then e of retailers' sales effort is introduced, and the marginal impact of sales effort on market demand is λ.…”
Section: Model Hypotheses Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the optimal decisions of the CLSC members are obtained by developing the Stackelberg game model where the manufacturer acts as a leader and retailer as a follower. The Stackelberg game models are widely used by numerous researchers such as Che et al [62], Wan et al [63], Su et al [64], Li et al [65], etc. to determine the optimal decision variables in various settings.…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e probability that the supplier does not have the risk of interruption is θ i ; then, the probability of the risk of interruption is (1 − θ i ). e probability of occurrence of interruption risk between two suppliers is independent and irrelevant, while the market's demand for manufacturers' products is price-sensitive and changes with changes in sales prices [36]. e first letter I and R of the subscript in the model represent model 1 and model 2, respectively; the subscripts s and m represent supplier and manufacturer, respectively.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%