2015
DOI: 10.16986/huje.2015013971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model Proposal on ICT Integration for Effective Mathematics Instruction

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The aim of this study is to present a model for an effective mathematics instruction with respect to how ICT integration is put into practice. The research was established on three bases as effective mathematics instruction, ICT integration and 5E learning cycle. A learning environment was created by grounding on these three elements. In this study, which was carried out in accordance with design-based research model, the participants were 47 preservice mathematics teachers. As data-collection tools, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To implementing the exploration step ◊ Missing interaction and discussion (Demirbas & Pektas, 2015;Iscan et al, 2015) A: The pre-service teachers did not provide enough opportunities for their students to make comparisons, interact with others, discuss their ideas after conflicting situations (Iscan et al, 2015, p. 323). To implementing the explanation step ◊ Teacher-centered (Enugu & Hokayem, 2017;Namdar & Kucuk, 2018;Yildiz & Kocak Usluel, 2016) ◊ Address misconception (Iscan et al, 2015;Metin & Ozmen, 2009) A: Rather than discussing the results of the experiments as mentioned in their lesson plan, they skipped the discussion part and read out definitions directly from the slides (Enugu & Hokayem, 2017, p. 184).…”
Section: / 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To implementing the exploration step ◊ Missing interaction and discussion (Demirbas & Pektas, 2015;Iscan et al, 2015) A: The pre-service teachers did not provide enough opportunities for their students to make comparisons, interact with others, discuss their ideas after conflicting situations (Iscan et al, 2015, p. 323). To implementing the explanation step ◊ Teacher-centered (Enugu & Hokayem, 2017;Namdar & Kucuk, 2018;Yildiz & Kocak Usluel, 2016) ◊ Address misconception (Iscan et al, 2015;Metin & Ozmen, 2009) A: Rather than discussing the results of the experiments as mentioned in their lesson plan, they skipped the discussion part and read out definitions directly from the slides (Enugu & Hokayem, 2017, p. 184).…”
Section: / 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the engagement phase of the 5E instructional model, pre-service teachers were challenged to find appropriate activities that would determine what students know or think about the topic (Demirbas & Pektas, 2015;Iscan et al, 2015;Metin & Ozmen, 2009;Namdar & Kucuk, 2018;Yildiz & Kocak Usluel, 2016).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the teacher's role in process innovation is analysed via the K20 model (WILLIAMS et al, 2008), the Teaching Development Programme model (TDP) (ALBION et al, 2015), the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) (KARMESHU et al, 2013;PEARSON, 2015), and the Technology Acceptance model (ALRESHEED et al, 2015). Regarding the study of the dynamic relationships between learning agents and ICT, Toh 2016, Zagami (2013) and Lin (2011) used the ecological model as a reference point.…”
Section: Models For the Pedagogical Integration Of Information And Comentioning
confidence: 99%