A model system for the evaluation of Individual Program Plans

Cummins, Robert A.; Baxter, Christine; Hudson, Alan R.; Jauernig, Roland

doi:10.1080/13668259600033041

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The assertion that plans ‘fail’ is supported by evidence from five published and one unpublished study. Of the five published studies, three were undertaken in Australia (Shaddock & Bramston 1991; Cummins et al 1994; Cummins et al 1996), the other two in North America (Miner & Bates 1997; Stancliffe et al . 1999).…”

Section: Pcp: Direct and Indirect Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

PlanningandAction: Comments on Mansell & Beadle‐Brown

Emerson

Stancliffe

2004

Research Intellect Disabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mansell & Beadle-Brown (2004) raise a number of concerns about the possible impact of the systematic introduction of person-centred planning (PCP) across services for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK. We too foresee a danger that system-wide adoption of PCP will be characterised over zealous`selling' of the purported bene®ts without suf®cient attention to the dif®culties and without the necessary changes to system architecture to ensure that those involved in PCP have the authority or resources to achieve the plan's goals. If so, PCP will become another fad, and service users, and their families will become even more discouraged, disheartened and alienated by a system characterised by rhetoric rather than meaningful action. Where we differ, is in the interpretation of the existing evidence regarding the impact of individual planning systems in general and, perhaps, in the way forward.

show abstract

Section: Pcp: Direct and Indirect Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

PlanningandAction: Comments on Mansell & Beadle‐Brown

Emerson

Stancliffe

2004

Research Intellect Disabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(1994) found that 19% of plans for 199 people had no review date and 30% of meetings were not attended by any family, friends or advocates of the individual service user. In a later study, Cummins et al. (1996) analysed 163 plans from 11 community‐living support services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Person‐Centred Planning or Person‐Centred Action? Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability Services

Mansell

Beadle‐Brown

2004

Research Intellect Disabil

168

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This critical review considers the nature and importance of person-centred planning in the context of current British policy and service development in intellectual disability. The difference between person-centred planning and other kinds of individual planning is discussed. Materials and method The scale of the task of implementing person-centred planning as a national policy initiative is considered. The limited evidence base for person-centred planning is reviewed and the reasons for the failure of previous attempts at individual planning are analysed.The assumption that person-centred services will be produced by a new kind of individual planning is questioned. Conclusions Consideration is given to what would be necessary to make services more person-centred, including changes in power relations, funding arrangements and staff training and supervision.

show abstract

“…Ideally, these goals and objectives are developed in dialogue with the person with ID and/or their families and significant others. Research has shown that goals and objectives in ISPs are often of poor quality (Shaddock & Bramston, 1991;Greasley, 1995;Cummins et al, 1996;Pretti-Frontczak & Bricker, 2000;Radcliffe & Hegarty, 2001;Cook et al, 2006;Taylor & Taylor, 2013), and that their content varies according to policy developments or the introduction of a new planning method (Wigham et al 2008;Lawlor et al 2013). In addition, relatively little is known about the relationship between individual client characteristics and the content of ISP goals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual support plans of people with intellectual disabilities in residential services: content analysis of goals and resources in relation to client characteristics

Herps

Buntinx

Schalock

et al. 2015

J intellect Disabil Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study offers empirical feedback on ISP practices in the field of ID in the Netherlands. In light of current ISP practices, results suggest that attention should be paid to: (1) distinguishing between a 'service contract' and an ISP; (2) keeping a focus on the whole person in all age groups and levels of functioning and (3) involving the service recipient in ISP development and implementation.

show abstract

A model system for the evaluation of Individual Program Plans

Cited by 7 publications

References 5 publications

PlanningandAction: Comments on Mansell & Beadle‐Brown

PlanningandAction: Comments on Mansell & Beadle‐Brown

Person‐Centred Planning or Person‐Centred Action? Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability Services

Individual support plans of people with intellectual disabilities in residential services: content analysis of goals and resources in relation to client characteristics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About