A Model to Calculate Fatigue Damage Caused by Partial Waking
during Wind Farm Optimization

Stanley, Andrew P. J.; King, Jennifer; Bay, Christopher J.; Ning, Andrew

doi:10.5194/wes-2020-117

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, if the wake is prominently reaching the falling blade, lower fluctuations in loads can be seen. This was explained nicely by Stanley et al (2020) and is confirmed here with the additional context of positive versus negative yaw angles.…”

Section: Asymmetries and Partial Wakingsupporting

confidence: 82%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Load assessment of a wind farm considering negative and positive yaw misalignment for wake steering

Thedin,

Barter,

Jonkman

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Wake steering strategies are employed to increase the overall power production of wind farms by deflecting wakes of upstream turbines away from downstream ones. The gain in net power comes at the expense of increased fatigue loads experienced by downstream turbines. In this work we investigate performance and fatigue loading characteristics of a small farm consisting of five aligned IEA Wind 15-MW wind turbines. A parametric study is performed where, for every wind direction from -20 to 20 degrees, the yaw misalignment angle varies from -25 to 25 degrees. This setup allowed us to investigate asymmetries and identify optimal conditions for a given wind direction. In general, we found that positive yaw configurations are preferred and that yaw configurations that result in attractive power gains (25 % or more when compared to a baseline no-yaw scenario) come with significant increase in fatigue loading (we used standard deviation and damage-equivalent load (DEL) of the blade-root, low-speed shaft, and tower-base moments as proxies for fatigue load). We found that for any given positive wind inflow angle, yaw angles between -2.5 and 15 degrees yield power gains of 10–20 % over a no-yaw baseline, and positive yaw is preferred because of lower fatigue loadings. For any given negative wind inflow angles, positive yaw also results in lower magnitudes of standard deviation and DEL for the channels investigated. A small power loss of up to 2 % is observed for some positive yaw angles under negative wind directions (as compared symmetric negative yaw and positive wind cases), but gains in terms of loads exceed 25 % and may be enough to justify a positive yaw configuration under negative winds as well. We show that such behavior can be explained by partial waking and the direction of rotation of the rotor.

show abstract

Section: Asymmetries and Partial Wakingsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…The impact on fatigue and turbine lifetime will be dependent on the frequency of wake steering (Shaler et al, 2022). There is also consensus that imperfect wake steering that exacerbates the presence of partial waking could be even more harmful than not employing wake steering at all (Ciri et al, 2018;Stanley et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%