2016
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m116.714287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modeling and Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Antigen Density, Binding Affinity, and Antigen Expression Ratio on Bispecific Antibody Binding to Cell Surface Targets

Abstract: Despite the increasing number of multivalent antibodies, bispecific antibodies, fusion proteins, and targeted nanoparticles that have been generated and studied, the mechanism of multivalent binding to cell surface targets is not well understood. Here, we describe a conceptual and mathematical model of multivalent antibody binding to cell surface antigens. Our model predicts that properties beyond 1:1 antibody:antigen affinity to target antigens have a strong influence on multivalent binding. Predicted crucial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While structural modeling suggests that simultaneous engagement of two epitopes on the same toxin molecule by a single antibody is unlikely, it is possible that the presence of a second epitope nearby makes it easier for a bivalent construct to rebind the same toxin, essentially "wobbling" between the two epitopes. Avidity effects of multivalent and bispecific formats have been modeled (51) and have been proposed as a way to drive higher-affinity and higher-specificity binding of targets with multiple epitopes. Alternatively, bridging of two toxin molecules by one monoclonal antibody can allow bivalent binding of a second antibody to a different epitope, which has been proposed as a mechanism for synergy in the neutralization of anthrax toxin (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While structural modeling suggests that simultaneous engagement of two epitopes on the same toxin molecule by a single antibody is unlikely, it is possible that the presence of a second epitope nearby makes it easier for a bivalent construct to rebind the same toxin, essentially "wobbling" between the two epitopes. Avidity effects of multivalent and bispecific formats have been modeled (51) and have been proposed as a way to drive higher-affinity and higher-specificity binding of targets with multiple epitopes. Alternatively, bridging of two toxin molecules by one monoclonal antibody can allow bivalent binding of a second antibody to a different epitope, which has been proposed as a mechanism for synergy in the neutralization of anthrax toxin (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further challenges are posed by unknown numbers and distributions of receptors on cell surfaces, as well as the lack of structural information on many of them . Improving our understanding of the numerous factors that have a role in tumor targeting requires the development of both theoretical and experimental models that can guide the design of tumor‐targeting antibodies and antibody mimetics for optimal affinity and efficacy …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, the model and its approximation can be extended with (i) TC effects on target cells, (ii) T cell rebound phenomena, and (iii) integration of local geometrical structures on the cell surface for the cross‐linking binding reactions . Inclusion of geometrical structures leads to mathematical models of the form Eqs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding kinetics of the BsAb [12][13][14][15][16] are presented in Figure 1a. It is assumed that free BsAb concentration C binds to two targets (e.g., receptors) R A and R B to form BCs, RC A and RC B .…”
Section: Theoretical (Model Structure and Equations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation