2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/327390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modern Syllogistic Method in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic with Realistic Tautology

Abstract: The Modern Syllogistic Method (MSM) of propositional logic ferrets out from a set of premises all that can be concluded from it in the most compact form. The MSM combines the premises into a single function equated to 1 and then produces the complete product of this function. Two fuzzy versions of MSM are developed in Ordinary Fuzzy Logic (OFL) and in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic (IFL) with these logics augmented by the concept of Realistic Fuzzy Tautology (RFT) which is a variable whose truth exceeds 0.5. The p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In computing the complete sum all don't-care configurations are considered asserted. There are many algorithmic ways to compute the complete sum (Muroga, 1979;Brown, 1990;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2001b;Rushdi et al, 2015a;2015b). The CKM is not particularly convenient for computing the complete sum (Muroga, 1979) since it is possible that some prime implicants might be overlooked.…”
Section: The Complete Sum Versus the Minimal Summentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In computing the complete sum all don't-care configurations are considered asserted. There are many algorithmic ways to compute the complete sum (Muroga, 1979;Brown, 1990;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2001b;Rushdi et al, 2015a;2015b). The CKM is not particularly convenient for computing the complete sum (Muroga, 1979) since it is possible that some prime implicants might be overlooked.…”
Section: The Complete Sum Versus the Minimal Summentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, its complement, the Boolean function of failure is given by [12, [29][30][31][32] ( , , , ,…”
Section: A) the Unit-gap Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementing both sides of (9), we obtain the system failure as a product of four sums (which, when multiplied out, and after absorbing all subsuming terms, yields a disjunction of all prime implicants of system failure) Using intelligent multiplication [40,42,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] { ∨ ∨ = ∨ }, we multiply out the first two terms in (10) to obtain ( 7 < 3 ∨ 2 < 3 3 < 3 ) ( 5 < 3 ∨ 8 < 3 ∨ 2 < 3 3 < 3 ) = 7 < 3 ( 5 < 3 ∨ 8 < 3 ) ∨ 2 < 3 3 < 3 = 7 < 3 5 < 3 ∨ 7 < 3 8 < 3 ∨ 2 < 3 3 < 3…”
Section: Suppliers Transfer Centers Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%