2019
DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified analytical framework for describing m-learning (as applied to early grade Mathematics)

Abstract: However, none of the interventions included in this special issue are related to teachers (caring adults or parents) and their instructional practices for mathematics. Neither did any of the interventions consider the possibility of utilising mobile technologies in this quest. We share Ebrahim and Pascal's (2016:3) urgency relating to young children and their families. We offer a focus on mathematics and m-learning as contribution towards their call 'to continue knowledge production about early care and educat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A search of the South African Journal of Childhood Education (SAJCE) 1 database yielded eight results related to "m-learning and ECD" and none of these pertained to pre-grade R practitioner skill training. Roberts and Spencer-Smith (2019) point to a 2016 special edition of the SAJCE, in which m-learning was notably absent from the interventions listed as useful in improving the instructional practice of ECD educators in the African context. Chee et al (2017) identify a dearth of research about m-learning in ECD in a global meta-analysis of 144 peer-reviewed articles on m-learning from six eminent journals spanning five years (2017, p. 118).…”
Section: Lack Of Research On M-learning In Pre-grade R Context In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A search of the South African Journal of Childhood Education (SAJCE) 1 database yielded eight results related to "m-learning and ECD" and none of these pertained to pre-grade R practitioner skill training. Roberts and Spencer-Smith (2019) point to a 2016 special edition of the SAJCE, in which m-learning was notably absent from the interventions listed as useful in improving the instructional practice of ECD educators in the African context. Chee et al (2017) identify a dearth of research about m-learning in ECD in a global meta-analysis of 144 peer-reviewed articles on m-learning from six eminent journals spanning five years (2017, p. 118).…”
Section: Lack Of Research On M-learning In Pre-grade R Context In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roberts and Spencer-Smith (2019) lament the lack of comparable or standard frameworks in studies on m-learning, noting that the paucity of standardised frameworks makes it difficult to draw meaningful comparisons between findings (Roberts & Spencer-Smith, 2019, p. 3). Roberts and Spencer-Smith (2019) propose adaptation or improvement of their own modified analytical framework for studies in the m-learning field, in order to establish "commonly agreed metrics and approaches, to measure and reflect on efficacy" (Roberts & Spencer-Smith, 2019, p. 10). apply the Roberts and Spencer-Smith ( 2019) framework to their analysis of four m-learning pilots in Africa.…”
Section: Research Question 1: Available Framework • What Are the Available Framework To Assess M-learning Options For Professional Develomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation