2022
DOI: 10.1186/s42155-022-00331-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified candy-plug technique to occlude false lumen in aortic dissection

Abstract: Purpose Aim of this technical note article is to introduce a modified, novel way to custom create a candy-plug (CP) device to endovascularly occlude false lumen. The technique is illustrated by a patient case with significant backflow to false lumen (FL). The patient had already undergone surgical repair of the ascending aorta, aortic arch and subsequent TEVAR procedure down to the ostium of the celiac trunk because of type A aortic dissection, but the descending thoracic aorta continued to dil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the Candy-Plug technique, there is a known issue of blood flow residue seeping through the gap between the false lumen wall and the deployed device, leading to gutter leaks. Although several modifications have been attempted, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] the fundamental form remains similar, and this issue has not been completely resolved. Circular stent grafts have not been able to fully occlude this gap in cases of crescent-shaped false lumen morphology (Figure 3A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the Candy-Plug technique, there is a known issue of blood flow residue seeping through the gap between the false lumen wall and the deployed device, leading to gutter leaks. Although several modifications have been attempted, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] the fundamental form remains similar, and this issue has not been completely resolved. Circular stent grafts have not been able to fully occlude this gap in cases of crescent-shaped false lumen morphology (Figure 3A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%