2022
DOI: 10.22266/ijies2022.0831.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Honey Badger Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow Optimization Problem

Abstract: This paper proposes a modified honey badger algorithm (MHBA) for solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. This problem is a highly non-linear, non-convex and complex optimization problem with several decision variables and constraints. The original honey badger algorithm (HBA) has the problem of trapping in local optima due to the loss of population diversity, especially in solving complex optimization problems. Therefore, the MHBA aims at sufficient improvement in finding the optimal solution and feasibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HBA and Adam algorithms were the next most effective in improving the predictive power of the DNN model. HBA has the advantages of a simple structure, few tuning parameters, easy implementation, powerful global search and efficient solution of the local optimization problem (Hashim et al, 2022;Yasear & Ghanimi, 2022). Adam has high computational efficiency, requires less memory and performs particularly well with large datasets, such as those used in the landslide susceptibility analysis in this study (Kingma & Ba, 2014;Salem et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBA and Adam algorithms were the next most effective in improving the predictive power of the DNN model. HBA has the advantages of a simple structure, few tuning parameters, easy implementation, powerful global search and efficient solution of the local optimization problem (Hashim et al, 2022;Yasear & Ghanimi, 2022). Adam has high computational efficiency, requires less memory and performs particularly well with large datasets, such as those used in the landslide susceptibility analysis in this study (Kingma & Ba, 2014;Salem et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than determined based on the fitness quality as in KMA, in SKA, the big male, small male, and female are determined randomly based on certain threshold [28]. In modified honey badger algorithm (MHBA), the leader is the best solution so far [29]. But each solution follows the leader based on two options.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But each solution follows the leader based on two options. The first option is randomized sinusoidal movement and the second option is randomized non-sinusoidal movement [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there are many studies proposing new swarm intelligence-based metaheuristics. Many metaheuristics were built based on the animal's behavior, such as emperor penguin colony (EPC) [4], red deer algorithm (RDA) [5], butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) [6], Komodo mlipir algorithm (KMA) [7], stochastic Komodo algorithm (SKA) [8], squirrel search optimizer (SSO) [9], modified honey badger algorithm (MHBA) [10], northern goshawk optimizer (NGO) [11], guided pelican algorithm (GPA) [12], and so on. Some metaheuristics were built based on the human social activities, such as teaching learning-based optimizer (TLBO) [13], election-based optimization algorithm (EBOA) [14], driving training-based optimizer (DTBO) [15], modified social forces algorithm (MSF) [16], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%