2004 IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2004.1414425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified hybrid DCT-SVD image-coding system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen from the results choosing a constant value of q is impractical because the amount of information is different from block to block. Figure (5) shows that the MSE method is better than a percentage of the discarded singular value method for selecting the retained singular values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As it can be seen from the results choosing a constant value of q is impractical because the amount of information is different from block to block. Figure (5) shows that the MSE method is better than a percentage of the discarded singular value method for selecting the retained singular values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors used the SVD combined with other transforms to achieve a good compression results. In [3,5], the image is divided into blocks of 8*8 pixels, and the SVD or DCT transform is applied to each block depends on the standard deviation of that block. Other works [6,7] combine the SVD with the DWT, the image is partitioned into tiles of 64*64 pixels, the Average Standard Deviation (ASTD) is computed for each tile depends on the standard deviations of 8*8 subblocks of the tile.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations