1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90442-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified impression technique for implant-supported restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fracture of implants and superstructure components, bone loss, and infectious processes can occur when the functional load is unequally distributed 7,12 . The accuracy of the master model can control and minimize the degree of imperfection in denture fabrication 13,14 . A factor that can contribute to the imprecise transfer of impression copings is a deficient splinting technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture of implants and superstructure components, bone loss, and infectious processes can occur when the functional load is unequally distributed 7,12 . The accuracy of the master model can control and minimize the degree of imperfection in denture fabrication 13,14 . A factor that can contribute to the imprecise transfer of impression copings is a deficient splinting technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting results have been reported in the literature regarding the accuracy of the direct nonsplinted and the direct splinted impression techniques. Some studies indicated that the direct‐splinted transfer impression techniques were more accurate than the direct nonsplinted transfer impression techniques . In contrast, other studies found the direct nonsplinted technique to be more accurate than the direct‐splinted technique .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicated that the direct-splinted transfer impression techniques were more accurate than the direct nonsplinted transfer impression techniques. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In contrast, other studies found the direct nonsplinted technique to be more accurate than the direct-splinted technique. 20,21 However, some studies showed no significant differences between the splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Occlusal forces and the passive fit of the suprastructure may influence the long-term success of the implants. 10 A multitude of methods have been suggested to facilitate these procedures, such as the intraoral fabrication of acrylic resin copings, 11,12 the use of customized impression elements, 13 or prefabricated acrylic resin bars, 14 the splinting of transfer copings, [15][16][17] and the fabrication of transfer keys. 18 Although the method described in this report used customized implant abutments, prefabricated titanium can also be used ( Figure 17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%