2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile flow behaviors of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy at high strain rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the deformation temperature is 800 • C, Equation (10) can be expressed as follows: Substituting the four different strain rates and the corresponding flow stress at different strains into Equation (12), the values of material constant C 1 can be evaluated by linear fitting the relationship between σ/(A 1 + B 1 ε + B 2 ε 2 ) and ln . ε * (shown in Figure 5).…”
Section: Modified Johnson-cook Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the deformation temperature is 800 • C, Equation (10) can be expressed as follows: Substituting the four different strain rates and the corresponding flow stress at different strains into Equation (12), the values of material constant C 1 can be evaluated by linear fitting the relationship between σ/(A 1 + B 1 ε + B 2 ε 2 ) and ln . ε * (shown in Figure 5).…”
Section: Modified Johnson-cook Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenological constitutive models are widely used to simulate the plastic forming processes of metals and alloys [11]. Among these phenomenological constitutive models, the Johnson-Cook model [12] and Arrhenius-type model [13] are extensively used in metals and alloys to describe the relationships between the flow stress, strain rate, and temperature. The Johnson-Cook model assumes that strain hardening, strain rate hardening, and thermal softening are three independent phenomena that can be isolated from each other [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with Arrhenius equation, JC constitutive equation has the characteristic of simple parameters. It is used to predict the rheological behavior of the material with little change in the flow stress after the peak stress, but the prediction effect is not ideal for the complex rheological behavior of those materials [35,47,48]. It is found that the second order polynomial can more accurately describe the relationship between flow stress and strain, rather than the original exponential expression.…”
Section: The Original Jc Model and Its Modified Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With EMF, the strain rate effect must be considered [26], and so the stress-strain data at various strain rates via quasi-static tests and Hopkinson bar tests are provided here. The quasi-static experiments were measured by SANS ® CMT5205 (Shenzhen, China) electronic universal testing machine at room temperature under a fixed strain rate of 10 −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Materials and Blankmentioning
confidence: 99%