2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified k-ω turbulence model for improved predictions of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamical component was constant, and the influence of the buoyancy force on the airflow was caused by the air density and pressure gradient. The airflow in the turbulent viscous model satisfied the continuity equation, while the momentum equation was represented by the Navier-Stokes equations [29]:…”
Section: Cfd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamical component was constant, and the influence of the buoyancy force on the airflow was caused by the air density and pressure gradient. The airflow in the turbulent viscous model satisfied the continuity equation, while the momentum equation was represented by the Navier-Stokes equations [29]:…”
Section: Cfd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies in uid dynamics have aimed to enhance comprehension and prediction capabilities. Saleh et al [16] addressed the consistency of a k − ω turbulence model for atmospheric boundary layer ows, enhancing it with additional source terms and rough wall functions. They compared diagnostic and prognostic approaches and found the prognostic method to be more suitable for complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%