2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified leapfrog scheme for shallow water equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be shown that this stability condition decreases to α igw = 1 on a staggered grid (e.g. Sun and Sun, 2011). accurate representation, good stability properties and ease of implementation of the different terms involved in the equations, as discussed in Section 2.1.…”
Section: Internal Gravity Wavesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It can be shown that this stability condition decreases to α igw = 1 on a staggered grid (e.g. Sun and Sun, 2011). accurate representation, good stability properties and ease of implementation of the different terms involved in the equations, as discussed in Section 2.1.…”
Section: Internal Gravity Wavesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 1. Ratio of computed phase speed to analytic phase speed C ph /C as function of wavelength (λ) and Courant number Co for 2nd-order scheme according to (24) [37].…”
Section: Modified Leapfrog Scheme For Shallow Water Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the crest, the simulated velocity s c U is identical to * s U , which has a physical solution (i.e., a real number instead of a complex number) of Equation (41). Equation (37) is also held at the crest, but not at the jump at x = 627 with u =175.7 cm s −1 , where the velocity calculated from Equation ( 41) is only 157.58 cm s −1 . The Bernoulli function (black line) drops from 22,948 to 20,485 cm 2 s −2 across the jump at t = 96 s, but J remains almost the same (284,582 vs. 284,581 cm 3 s −2 ), except small kinks at the jump and obstacle foots, because it is derived from an inviscid Equation (38) of mass flux in Figure 9.…”
Section: Hydraulic Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues and non-linear simulations of the nonhydrostatic model (NH) using the conventional forwardÁ backward scheme (FB) (Mesinger and Arakawa, 1976;Sun, 1980Sun, , 1984, the horizontal explicit and vertical implicit scheme (HEÁVI) (Klemp and Wilhelmson, 1978;Saito, 2007) and the modified non-hydrostatic model (MNH) have been discussed in Sun et al (2012), hereafter referred to as Part I. The MNH is designed to suppress highfrequency acoustic waves by multiplying the left-hand side of the continuity equation by a parameter d, where 16 ]d ]4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
A B S T R A C T Sun et al (2012) proposed a modified non-hydrostatic model (MNH), in which the left-hand side of the continuity equation is multiplied by a parameter d (45d516 in the article) to suppress high-frequency acoustic waves. They showed that the MNH allows a longer time step than the original non-hydrostatic model (NH).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%