2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Likelihood Ratio Test for Homogeneity in Finite Mixture Models

Abstract: Testing for homogeneity in ®nite mixture models has been investigated by many researchers. The asymptotic null distribution of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is very complex and dif®cult to use in practice. We propose a modi®ed LRT for homogeneity in ®nite mixture models with a general parametric kernel distribution family. The modi®ed LRT has a 2 -type of null limiting distribution and is asymptotically most powerful under local alternatives. Simulations show that it performs better than competing tests. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
167
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
167
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice this method has three drawbacks: (i) the likelihood ratio test does not have a simple approximate limiting distribution for tail probabilities; (ii) the likelihood surface may possess multiple modes, and without a careful choice of starting values, a standard optimization routine may fail to find the global maximum; and (iii), an arbitrary lower bound on the missing weights is required and it requires some care to implement correctly. Chen et al [2001] offer an alternative solution that also attempts to circumvent the dif-ficulties encountered when conducting a likelihood ratio test for mixture models. Their solution involves utilizing a penalized likelihood approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice this method has three drawbacks: (i) the likelihood ratio test does not have a simple approximate limiting distribution for tail probabilities; (ii) the likelihood surface may possess multiple modes, and without a careful choice of starting values, a standard optimization routine may fail to find the global maximum; and (iii), an arbitrary lower bound on the missing weights is required and it requires some care to implement correctly. Chen et al [2001] offer an alternative solution that also attempts to circumvent the dif-ficulties encountered when conducting a likelihood ratio test for mixture models. Their solution involves utilizing a penalized likelihood approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (followed by Qin et al) proposed a simple and clever idea to avoid the degeneracy problems: they add a penalization to the log-likelihood with a factor increasing to infinity as the parameters tend to values where degeneracy occurs. They consequently obtain convex combination of chi-square for the asymptotic distribution of the modified testing statistic, see [8,9,38,39].…”
Section: Motivations and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste caso, na distribuição de renda per capita cross-section, os componentes correspondem a grupos com diferentes níveis de renda per capita. Chen et al (2001Chen et al ( , 2004 sugerem aplicar um teste modificado de razão de probabilidades (likelihood ratio test, LRT) para determinar o número de componentes do modelo de misturas finitas. Deve ser mencionado que este teste não é alterado sob transformação monotônica dos dados, sendo o resultado completamente consistente quando as variáveis são testadas em log.…”
Section: Distribuição De Misturas Finitas: Definição E Teste Lr Para unclassified