2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18] As we already mentioned above, an accurate density-elasticity correlation concerning the pelvic bone is not known yet, it has only been determined with indirect methods. [10,15] Nevertheless, our mean elastic modulus values (sacrum 3710 MPa, pelvic bone 4900 MPa) calculated from the cortical-cancellous bone ratio nears those, that can be found in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17][18] As we already mentioned above, an accurate density-elasticity correlation concerning the pelvic bone is not known yet, it has only been determined with indirect methods. [10,15] Nevertheless, our mean elastic modulus values (sacrum 3710 MPa, pelvic bone 4900 MPa) calculated from the cortical-cancellous bone ratio nears those, that can be found in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method is determination of the elasticity from the density, [10,[15][16][17][18] although such a value explicitly for the pelvis bone has not been determined to date. Recommendations for the most feasible density-elasticity relationship are already available.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material properties that vary spatially inside each finite element cannot be simply defined in FEA codes. Thus they have not been used very much, although they are reported to yield more accurate strain results [14]. The constant values assignment approach has many variations, depending on how the average value of a material property is calculated from CT numbers.…”
Section: Bone Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between those variations is reflected in the av-eraging technique used. According to the simplest one, density values are assigned to every finite element node, based on the nearest value on CT sampling grid, and then a weighted average of nodal values is assigned to the element [14]. According to another technique, average element density is calculated from eight points surrounding element centroid [14].…”
Section: Bone Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the modulus distribution in the male model was likely to be more accurate than that in the female model because the slice distance (0.5 mm) of the male CT images was just half of that of the female images and the unknown modulus values between the CT images were determined by averaging the known values. This is well known as the partial volume effects in the field of CT image analysis (51,52) .…”
Section: Distribution Of Young's Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%