2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified molecular-continuum model for estimating the strength and fracture toughness of graphene and carbon nanotube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2] even differ from the data by MMC method in Ref. [3] by two orders of magnitude. Furthermore, monocrystal graphene is a kind of anisotropic 2D material.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2] even differ from the data by MMC method in Ref. [3] by two orders of magnitude. Furthermore, monocrystal graphene is a kind of anisotropic 2D material.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results showed that the interlayer shear interaction increases the natural frequencies because of the prevention to the lateral displacements by shear forces. Molecular dynamic (MD) simulations [62] also show sp 3 bonds can reduce Young's modulus, the tensile strength and the critical fracture strain, but strengthen the interlayer shear modulus and the load transfer rate, thus making graphene sheets more stable under axial compression. simulation to study the interlayer shear effects on vibrational behavior of cantilever and bridged bilayer graphene.…”
Section: Bilayer Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this approach, Li and Chou calculated Young’s moduli and shear moduli of GSs and SWCNTs with different diameters, which were 0.85~1.05 TPa and 0.2~0.5 TPa, respectively, as shown in Figure 3 . Up to now, the approach of MSM has been widely adopted for calculating the material properties (e.g., Young’s modulus and shear modulus) of CNTs (e.g., [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ]) and GSs (e.g., [ 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ]) for mechanical analysis with continuum shell and beam models.…”
Section: Continuum Models Of Carbon Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%