2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05723-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified pediatric ocular trauma score for predicting visual outcome post open globe injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies suggest that OGI is more common in children younger than 7 years, while others indicate a higher prevalence in the age group of 7-12 years. [ 7 - 10 ] In the study by Cohen et al, age was excluded from MPOTS staging because it was not predictive,[ 6 ] aligning with our findings. While the literature shows that ocular trauma in the pediatric age group is more common in males, there are also studies suggesting no gender difference, especially in the preschool age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies suggest that OGI is more common in children younger than 7 years, while others indicate a higher prevalence in the age group of 7-12 years. [ 7 - 10 ] In the study by Cohen et al, age was excluded from MPOTS staging because it was not predictive,[ 6 ] aligning with our findings. While the literature shows that ocular trauma in the pediatric age group is more common in males, there are also studies suggesting no gender difference, especially in the preschool age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Collected data included patient demographics, type of injury, time from injury to surgery, complete ophthalmological examination results, initial and final visual acuity, and anterior segment and fundus findings (such as hyphema, iris prolapse, traumatic cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, etc.). Patients were scored using the MPOTS as described by Cohen et al[ 6 ] This scoring system considers initial visual acuity, wound location, and the presence of concomitant ocular pathologies ( Table 1 ). In cases where visual acuity could not be determined in children, MPOTS was calculated as follows: double the points for the injury location, minus points for the corresponding pathologies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we found a significantly higher rate of ocular injury in boys than in girls, similar to other studies. 8,[17][18][19][20][21] This significant difference was similar to the gender difference in adults. 22 This result shows that boys are more open to traumas than girls because they are more active, more free, adventurous and curious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In terms of injury site, zone 1 injury was the most common with a high rate in our study (87 %)., as in many other studies in the literature. 12,19,21 When the literature is scanned, many factors that determine the prognosis of penetrating eye injuries have been identified. Visual acuity, [22][23][24][25][26][27] which is the most important among them, followed by wound site and size, [23][24][25]29 presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), [23][24][25] mechanism of injury, [23][24][25][26] intraocular hemorrhage, lens damage, 23,24 retinal detachment, 25,30 presence of intraocular foreign body and endophthalmitis 26,27,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%