2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10884-009-9155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Poincaré Method for the Persistence of Periodic Orbits and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the system is not smooth in finite time, regularity (in space or time) of the elements J can be very difficult to prove or could be even false. Note that regularity results are primordial in the theory of perturbations of invariant sets and in particular of periodic orbits, as shown in [24] (see also [25]). Numerous authors have shown regularity properties for J in the case of dynamical systems which are not smoothness in finite time.…”
Section: ) Then There Exists a Setmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the system is not smooth in finite time, regularity (in space or time) of the elements J can be very difficult to prove or could be even false. Note that regularity results are primordial in the theory of perturbations of invariant sets and in particular of periodic orbits, as shown in [24] (see also [25]). Numerous authors have shown regularity properties for J in the case of dynamical systems which are not smoothness in finite time.…”
Section: ) Then There Exists a Setmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let p 0 ptq be a simple periodic solution of period ω 0 ą 0 of (1.1) for f " f 0 . Assume that sup tPr0,ω 0 q }p 0 ptq} L 8 ď m and sup tPr0,ω 0 q }∇p 0 ptq} L 8 ď m. The statement of the persistence of a simple periodic solution p f ptq near p 0 ptq with period ω f close to ω 0 and also of the uniqueness (up to a time translation) of this periodic solution, if f belongs to a small enough neighborhood of f 0 in C r pΩˆr´2m, 2msˆr´2m, 2ms d q, is a direct consequence of [31,Theorem 8.3.2]; it is proved by using the method of Poincaré sections and the implicit function theorem or the fixed point theorem of strict contraction (for further results in the case where the perturbations are less regular, see also [23] and [24]). One concludes like in the proof of the statement 1) by using the restriction mapping R of Section 2.1.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the question, whether a nondegenerate time-periodic solution to a dissipative nonlinear wave equation is locally unique (up to time shifts in the autonomous case) and whether it depends smoothly on the system parameters, is much more delicate than for ODEs or parabolic PDEs (cf., e.g., [14,15]). One reason for that is the so-called loss of derivatives for hyperbolic PDEs.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%