1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(80)90095-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified pulsed gradient technique for measuring diffusion in the presence of large background gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
143
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same result as expression (19) was obtained in [42]. For PGSE or PGSTE experiments, the PFG signal attenuation calculated based …”
Section: Normal Diffusionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same result as expression (19) was obtained in [42]. For PGSE or PGSTE experiments, the PFG signal attenuation calculated based …”
Section: Normal Diffusionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The results here can be easily extended to handle PFG anomalous diffusion of intramolecular MQC [27,40]. As the gradient field-induced phase evolution of an n-order intramolecular MQC is n times faster than the corresponding single quantum coherence, the PFG signal attenuation of intramolecular MQC is the same as that of single quantum coherence with an effective gradient intensity ng [42]. Therefore, for intramolecular MQC in PGSE or PGSTE experiments, the PFG signal attenuation equation is for calculating the MLF function by other methods to a desired accuracy can be found at www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/8738-mittag-leffer-function, 2005.…”
Section: Virtual Phase-space Diffusion Real-space Spin Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The results were noticeably better than in an earlier study (10), because of several critical improvements in the methods: (i) The study was performed at 3T by using an eight-channel phased-array coil, instead of a head coil at 1.5T, which provides a higher signal-to-noise ratio. (ii) As an important improvement to Darquie et al (10), the diffusion MRI sequence was carefully chosen to be immune to background mesoscopic field gradients produced by local magnetic susceptibility inhomogeneities in the cortical tissue (20,21). Such susceptibility effects can, in particular, be induced by paramagnetic blood deoxyhemoglobin and result in an artifactual underestimation of the diffusion coefficient measured with most diffusion MRI sequences (22,23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight oblique slices centered on calcarine fissure were selected from a rapid localization scan. To minimize residual susceptibility effects the diffusion fMRI sequence (data set A) consisted in a twice refocused spin-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence sensitized to diffusion by an interleaved pair of bipolar magnetic field gradient pulses (20,21). Acquisition parameters were as follows: slice thickness ϭ 3.8 mm with 50% gap, pixel size ϭ 3.75 2 mm 2 , generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) with 2-fold acceleration, 87 ms echo time, 1 s repetition time, 1,302 Hz bandwidth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bPGSTE measurements increased by 15% and 6%, while the MAGSTE measurements changed by 7% and 3%, respectively, for the 90 and 150 μm bead phantoms, providing evidence that although the heterogeneous background gradients may affect both bPGSTE and the MAGSTE measurements, the MAGSTE method is clearly less susceptible to such artifacts. In addition, the surface-to-volume ratio (S/V) was derived by fitting the normalized diffusion rate with diffusion length of short duration (i.e., ) using [24;25], (9) The S/V characterized using the MAGSTE measurements were 0.16 and 0.10 μm −1 for the 90 and 150 μm beads, respectively. On the other hand, the S/V derived using bPGSTE measurements were 0.09 and 0.08 μm −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%