2022
DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2022.122012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Regression Estimator for Single Phase Sampling in the Presence of Observational Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 presents the results of the biases, MSEs and PREs of the reviewed estimators and that of proposed estimators using simulated data from population 3 defined in Table 1. The results shows that all the proposed estimators under imputation schemes has minimum MSEs and higher PREs compared to all the existing estimators cons9idered in this study with the exception Salim and Onyango [29] estimator ( so t ) and Maneer et al [28] estimator (   1 m t ) which is a little higher than the proposed estimator ( ** 1 T ). Also, the proposed estimator ( * 4 T ) under call-back has minimum MSEs and higher PREs than most of the estimators under study with the exception Salim and Onyango [29] so t , Maneer et al [28] estimator (   Table 4 presents the results of the biases, MSEs and PREs of the reviewed estimators and that of proposed estimators using simulated data from population 5 defined in Table 1.…”
Section:    mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 presents the results of the biases, MSEs and PREs of the reviewed estimators and that of proposed estimators using simulated data from population 3 defined in Table 1. The results shows that all the proposed estimators under imputation schemes has minimum MSEs and higher PREs compared to all the existing estimators cons9idered in this study with the exception Salim and Onyango [29] estimator ( so t ) and Maneer et al [28] estimator (   1 m t ) which is a little higher than the proposed estimator ( ** 1 T ). Also, the proposed estimator ( * 4 T ) under call-back has minimum MSEs and higher PREs than most of the estimators under study with the exception Salim and Onyango [29] so t , Maneer et al [28] estimator (   Table 4 presents the results of the biases, MSEs and PREs of the reviewed estimators and that of proposed estimators using simulated data from population 5 defined in Table 1.…”
Section:    mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The results shows that all the proposed estimators under imputation schemes has minimum MSEs and higher PREs compared to all the existing estimators considered in this study. Also, the proposed estimator ( * 1 T ) under call-back has minimum MSEs and higher PREs than most of the estimators under study with the exception of Salim and Onyango [29] so t , Maneer et al [28] estimators (  …”
Section:    mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations