1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00121-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
221
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
221
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected conditions were used to evaluate the IgG reactivity of sera samples from patients with other relevant infectious-parasitic diseases (Figure 3). The data were further analyzed with the two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC) using the CMDT software package 19 . This method reads valid pairs of sensitivity and specificity considering pre-assigned cutoff values and allows the selection of the best condition for data interpretations.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected conditions were used to evaluate the IgG reactivity of sera samples from patients with other relevant infectious-parasitic diseases (Figure 3). The data were further analyzed with the two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC) using the CMDT software package 19 . This method reads valid pairs of sensitivity and specificity considering pre-assigned cutoff values and allows the selection of the best condition for data interpretations.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first approach, valid pairs of sensitivity and specificity were read for pre-assigned cutoff values directly from the TG-ROC plots 19 . The TG-ROC analysis showed that the in-house ELISA used to detect total IgG reactivity did not present any intermediate range (IR) that can be considered a borderline range for the clinical interpretation of test results, therefore indicating that the method displayed 100% valid data with no incorrect results.…”
Section: Discrimination Between Trypanosoma Cruzi Infection and Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutoff value (CV) for the FAS score was created with 3 methods: 1) the Youden Index (YI) [13] [14], which evaluates the value for which "sensitivity -(1 -specificity)" is the highest; 2) a method that evaluates the shortest distance from the coordinates (false-positive ratio, sensitivity) = (0, 1) to the ROC curve (the Minimum Distance method [MD]) [15]; and 3) the Two-Graph ROC method (TG) [16], which determines the value that is at the intersection of the FAS score-sensitivity curve and the FAS score-specificity curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-off value was established to achieve a minimum of 99% specificity [14]. Diagnostic accuracy was further evaluated with the aid of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in StatsDirect version 2.7.8 software.…”
Section: Brucellin Skin Testmentioning
confidence: 99%