2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 When properly implemented, the intent of HCD is to provide public health organisations a pathway to sharing (and where applicable, handing over) power in order to achieve true citizen participation and control. 24 Failure to apply HCD principles in an authentic or purposeful way usually results in tokenism, and development of solutions that are unsustainable. 32 It can also "exacerbate social exclusion and destroy trust systems" when done poorly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 When properly implemented, the intent of HCD is to provide public health organisations a pathway to sharing (and where applicable, handing over) power in order to achieve true citizen participation and control. 24 Failure to apply HCD principles in an authentic or purposeful way usually results in tokenism, and development of solutions that are unsustainable. 32 It can also "exacerbate social exclusion and destroy trust systems" when done poorly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 To date, there have been limited studies or reports detailing an implementation evaluation of an entire HCD project. Most studies address only one aspect of the design process such as planning, 18,22 prototyping 23 or assessing stakeholder engagement 24 but do not evaluate the entire approach. This study aimed to evaluate the HCD approach that < BLINDED>, a small < BLINDED>-based not-for-pro t focused on improving access to healthcare for refugees and new migrants, undertook in developing a web-based application to deliver local, evidencebased and culturally relevant SRH information to its users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bu üç aşamanın, derinlemesine araştırmalarla paydaşların arzularının ve yaşadıkları zorlukların anlaşılması (ilham alma), fikirlerin geliştirilmesinde iş birliği sağlama (fikirleştirme) ve çözümlerin paydaşlardan gelen geribildirimler doğrultusunda optimize edilmesi (hayata geçirme) açısından sağlık sektörüne katkı sağladığını savunmuşlardır. 13 Yapılan literatür taramasında, tasarım odaklı düşünmeyi merkeze alan ortodonti alanında herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışma, tasarım odaklı düşünme yönteminin, ortodontiye özgü yenilikçi ürün tasarlama süreçlerinde nasıl etkin kullanılabileceğine dair, ortodonti uzmanları ve tasarımcılar arası bir iş birliği modelini ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Connecting with the requests of the real user and the population in need is the first step in the DT methodology. Claiming expertise and knowledge of the scrutinised behaviour/phenomenon when the user is not available, can possibly lead to unproperly clarified problems and quick fixes based on preconceived notions (see "empowerment model for health", [60]). Disciplines that have been scrutinising potential solutions effectively (i.e.…”
Section: Design Thinking In Physical Activity and Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%