A Modified Tri-Exponential Model for Multi-b-value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Method to Detect the Strictly Diffusion-Limited Compartment in Brain

Abstract

Purpose: To present a new modified tri-exponential model for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to detect the strictly diffusion-limited compartment, and to compare it with the conventional bi- and tri-exponential models.Methods: Multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 17 b-values up to 8,000 s/mm2 were performed on six volunteers. The corrected Akaike information criterions (AICc) and squared predicted errors (SPE) were calculated to compare these three models.Results: The mean f0 values were ranging 11.9–18.7% in white matter ROIs and 1.2–2.7% in gray matter ROIs. In all white matter ROIs: the AICcs of the modified tri-exponential model were the lowest (p < 0.05 for five ROIs), indicating the new model has the best fit among these models; the SPEs of the bi-exponential model were the highest (p < 0.05), suggesting the bi-exponential model is unable to predict the signal intensity at ultra-high b-value. The mean ADCvery−slow values were extremely low in white matter (1–7 × 10−6 mm2/s), but not in gray matter (251–445 × 10−6 mm2/s), indicating that the conventional tri-exponential model fails to represent a special compartment.Conclusions: The strictly diffusion-limited compartment may be an important component in white matter. The new model fits better than the other two models, and may provide additional information.

Towards unconstrained compartment modeling in white matter using diffusion‐relaxation MRI with tensor‐valued diffusion encoding

“…The diffusivity bounds were enforced through penalties ensuring axial and radial diffusivities between 0.2 and 4 μm 2 /ms. A lower bound above zero is the “zeppelin” compartment’s main characteristic and avoids representing water at the “dot‐compartment” limit of zero isotropic diffusivity, which is presumably negligible in healthy white matter . For T 2 values, the lower bound avoids representing water presumably fully attenuated at our echo times (e.g., myelin water), and the upper bounds were considered safe assumptions for water within “stick‐like” structures and in tissue without major contamination with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), respectively.…”

The dot-compartment revealed? Diffusion MRI with ultra-strong gradients and spherical tensor encoding in the living human brain

“…Previous work investigating compartmental contributions to the dMRI signal from conventional pulsed-gradient encoding – also called Stejskal-Tanner encoding ( Stejskal and Tanner, 1965 ) or linear tensor encoding (LTE ( Westin et al., 2016 )) – showed that including a dot-compartment provided a more complete description of the WM dMRI signal, both ex vivo ( Panagiotaki et al., 2012 ) and in vivo ( Ferizi et al., 2014 ; Zeng et al., 2018 ). However, a dot-compartment is not generally included in WM biophysical models, e.g.…”

Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)

“…The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is the most widely used metric in oncology for disease detection [73, 74], prognosis [75] and response evaluation [76, 77]. Post-processing methods to derive absolute quantitation are extensively debated [78, 79], but the technique is robust with good reproducibility in multicentre, multivendor trials across tumour types [80]. Refinements to model intravascular incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion kurtosis are currently research tools.…”