2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-020-0609-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified turbulence model for simulating airflow aircraft cabin environment with mixed convection

Abstract: The forced convection (air supply jet) and the natural convection (thermal plume of passenger) co-exist in an aircraft cabin simultaneously. Due to the notable difference of the Reynolds numbers for the two convection processes, the traditional RANS method can hardly simulate the forced/natural convection flows accurately at the same time. In addition, the large geometric ratio between the main air supply inlet and the whole cabin leads to difficulties in grid generation for the cabin space. An efficient compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analysing an aircraft cabin airflow field simulated in only a single row, the results match the experimental data well. 30,31 Therefore, the computational domain was created for only one row, as shown as Figure 2. Six seated thermal manikins separated by the aisle and two inlets and outlets were set in the computational domain, as illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analysing an aircraft cabin airflow field simulated in only a single row, the results match the experimental data well. 30,31 Therefore, the computational domain was created for only one row, as shown as Figure 2. Six seated thermal manikins separated by the aisle and two inlets and outlets were set in the computational domain, as illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANS modeling is the most economical, but its accuracy is unsatisfactory. To fix the low‐accuracy problem associated with the standard k‐ε model, Zhao et al 43 made ad hoc modifications to the coefficients in the dissipative equation to achieve closer agreement with the experimental data. These modifications were not based on the principle of solid fluid flow,so, the model's performance was case dependent.…”
Section: State‐of‐the‐art In Cabin Air Environment Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the notable difference of the Reynolds numbers for the two convection processes, the traditional RANS method can hardly simulate the forced/ natural convection flows accurately at the same time. 66 Thermal plume is also the main factor causing unsteady fluctuation in the cabin. 66 Moreover, the seven-row cabin was affected by the cabin sealing conditions, and the experimental measurement also has errors.…”
Section: Application In the Complex Geometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 Thermal plume is also the main factor causing unsteady fluctuation in the cabin. 66 Moreover, the seven-row cabin was affected by the cabin sealing conditions, and the experimental measurement also has errors. Therefore, the simulation error is larger than the first two cases.…”
Section: Application In the Complex Geometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%