1998
DOI: 10.1109/87.709497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modular methodology for fast fault detection and classification in power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing solutions can be classified in two different categories [Chowdhury, 1998;Isermann 2004]: a) Fault detection and identification using dedicated observers, detection and identification algorithms, and smart AHS simulation. b) Fault management using FDIM architecture and simulation results.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Isolation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing solutions can be classified in two different categories [Chowdhury, 1998;Isermann 2004]: a) Fault detection and identification using dedicated observers, detection and identification algorithms, and smart AHS simulation. b) Fault management using FDIM architecture and simulation results.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Isolation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of applying wavelet transform in fault location of power system have already been recognized by many researchers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, the wavelet transform itself has limitations for accurate fault location because there are many irregular waveforms in measured original signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse protecting mechanisms of transmission lines have been proposed earlier to detect and classify fault utilizing high frequency noise generated by fault and NNs [5], initial current travelling wave technique [6], wavelet transform [7], wavelet fuzzy combined approach [8], high speed protective relaying using ANN architecture and digital signal processing concepts. [9], modular yet integrated approach using modified Kohonen-type neural network [10], combined supervised and unsupervised neural network with ISODATA clustering algorithm [11], RBF NN with OLS learning method [12] and Combined fuzzy neural network [13][14][15][16] wavelet analysis and ANN [17][18][19], ANN Approach [20][21][22][23][24][25]. However these techniques did not identify the fault direction and section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%