2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-7207(04)00008-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular basis for embryo apposition at the luminal epithelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason could be that microarray-based approaches to identify genes in the uterus during the postimplantation period have focused on early implantation stages (between days 4 and 6 of pregnancy), with no separate analysis of implantation and interimplantation sites in the study by Yoshioka et al (57), for example, or with a separate study of both uterus regions but including the embryonic genomic changes as well (41). When both uterine regions have been considered, only the epithelium was studied (56). Furthermore, those early studies used Affymetrix murine U74A or Digital Genomics Mouse 6K gene chips, where the expression of no more than 7,000 genes was considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason could be that microarray-based approaches to identify genes in the uterus during the postimplantation period have focused on early implantation stages (between days 4 and 6 of pregnancy), with no separate analysis of implantation and interimplantation sites in the study by Yoshioka et al (57), for example, or with a separate study of both uterus regions but including the embryonic genomic changes as well (41). When both uterine regions have been considered, only the epithelium was studied (56). Furthermore, those early studies used Affymetrix murine U74A or Digital Genomics Mouse 6K gene chips, where the expression of no more than 7,000 genes was considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in breast cancer cells IGF1R activation upregulates fascin-1, a modulator of adhesion and cell-cell interactions (Wong et al, 1999) to promote reorganization of cell-cell contacts (Guvakova et al, 2002a;Guvakova et al, 2002b;Yamashiro et al, 1998). Increased expression of fascin has been reported at implantation sites in mice, suggesting that it has a potential role in the initial adhesion stages (Yoon et al, 2004). However, in recent years it has emerged that binding and crosstalk between IGF1R and cell-cell or cell-matrix adhesion molecules can occur in either the presence or absence of IGF ligand, including with integrin avb3 Xi et al, 2008), which is involved in implantation (Kang et al, 2014;Lessey, 1997).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The murine studies have used several different paradigms to identify receptivity genes. These include comparisons of: implantation vs intersite tissue (whole uterus (Nie et al 2000b) or luminal epithelium only (Yoon et al 2004)), prereceptive vs receptive uterus (Yoshioka et al 2000) and delayed vs nidatory oestrogen-treated uteri (Reese et al 2001). The ability of microarrays to analyse thousands of mRNAs simultaneously provides a powerful new approach to the identification of markers of receptivity.…”
Section: The Use Of Arrays To Identify Genes Involved In Endometrial mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand the responses of individual endometrial compartments, and how they may influence each other, it will be necessary to isolate individual cell types to determine their unique transcriptome. One solution to this problem is the technique of LCM, which has recently been used to study luminal gene changes induced by blastocyst apposition (Yoon et al 2004). In this approach, individual cells or groups of cells such as luminal or glandular epithelium can be isolated under the microscope from tissue sections and RNA from them interrogated by microarrays.…”
Section: Microarray Studies Of Endometriummentioning
confidence: 99%