1975
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1975.59.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A moment problem for positive measures on the unit disc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that the method of proof of Theorem 9.2 is adapted from Atzmon [6]. We also remark that an operator measure dλ is uniquely determined by (9.6) (Stone-Weierstrass); the same uniqueness remark applies in the context of Proposition 9.3 below.…”
Section: Olofsson Ieotmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We remark that the method of proof of Theorem 9.2 is adapted from Atzmon [6]. We also remark that an operator measure dλ is uniquely determined by (9.6) (Stone-Weierstrass); the same uniqueness remark applies in the context of Proposition 9.3 below.…”
Section: Olofsson Ieotmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As an application of Theorem 9.1 we have the following variation of a moment problem considered by Atzmon [6]; see also [30,Theorem 3.7]. Proof.…”
Section: Operator Model Theory N-hypercontractionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Notice that the -compactness of F is not essential in the proof of part (iii) of Proposition 1; indeed, the continuity of and the regularity of (cf. footnote 1 ) imply the inner regularity of which, in turn, yields…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. and the measure dρ(z) is situated on the whole C, on the half of C, on the rectangle, on the disc of radius R in C, and so on [1,2,8,9,16,29]; the consideration of a correspondence positive defined functions see also in [10,13,24]. For the beginning we consider (1.1) in the case m, n ∈ N 0 and dρ(z) defined on C. The second part of the article (Subsection 4) will be devoted to the interesting for mathematical physic infinite-dimensional generalization of such theory, where in the integral (1.1) we change C to a complex nuclear space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%