1999
DOI: 10.1007/s004360050585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A monoclonal antibody reacts species-specifically with amylopectin granules of Eimeria bovis merozoites

Abstract: An IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 35B9) developed against first-generation merozoites of Eimeria bovis was shown by immunoelectron microscopy to react selectively with antigens localized in amylopectin granules. Amylopectin does not contribute to the epitope, as enzymatic degradation of carbohydrates in the parasite did not alter the binding pattern of mAb 35B9. When tested by immunoblotting, despite its organelle specificity the mAb recognized a variety of E. bovis merozoite I components with predominant molec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting monoclonal antibody that binds species-specifically to amylopectin granules in Eimeria bovis has been utilized by Heise et al (1999). The granule epitope involved was not destroyed by a-amylase and b-glucosidase digestion, but destruction of O-linked carbohydrate by alkaline treatment did destroy the epitope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting monoclonal antibody that binds species-specifically to amylopectin granules in Eimeria bovis has been utilized by Heise et al (1999). The granule epitope involved was not destroyed by a-amylase and b-glucosidase digestion, but destruction of O-linked carbohydrate by alkaline treatment did destroy the epitope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous structural studies of other coccidian parasites have been published. Some emphasis has been placed upon the presence of amylopectin granules in the developmental stages of Eimeria sparis (Alvares-Pellitero, Palenzuela & Sitja-Bobadilla, 1997), Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii (Speer, Clark & Dubey, 1998 ;Speer et al 1999 ;Ferguson, Brecht & Sodati, 2000 ;Medina et al 2001) and Eimeria bovis (Heise, Peters & Zahner, 1999) and Eimeria sp. (Roberts & Hammond, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%