2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011052108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A monodactyl nonavian dinosaur and the complex evolution of the alvarezsauroid hand

Abstract: Digital reduction is a striking evolutionary phenomenon that is clearly exemplified in theropod dinosaurs by the functionally didactyl manus of tyrannosaurids, the flight-adapted manus of birds (Aves), and the tridactyl but digit II-dominated manus of alvarezsauroids. The enlargement of manual digit II in alvarezsauroids and the concurrent reduction of the lateral digits have been interpreted as adaptations for digging, although no detailed biomechanical analysis of hand function has so far been carried out fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
88
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the manual morphology of those nonavian theropods differs substantially from the avian hands and did not function in flight. For instance, the unique manus in alvarezsauroids has been regarded as adaptation for digging (23). We performed a parsimony-based ancestral state reconstruction for the alula-major metacarpals and pelvis fusions across the phylogeny of Paraves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manual morphology of those nonavian theropods differs substantially from the avian hands and did not function in flight. For instance, the unique manus in alvarezsauroids has been regarded as adaptation for digging (23). We performed a parsimony-based ancestral state reconstruction for the alula-major metacarpals and pelvis fusions across the phylogeny of Paraves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only one parvicursorine— Linhenykus monodactylus Xu et al 2011—is known from the same locality and formation as IVPP V20341 (Bayan Mandahu, Inner Mongolia, China; the Upper Cretaceous—possibly Campanian—Wulansuhai Formation (Xu et al, 2010b; Eberth, 1993; Jerzykiewicz et al, 1993)). However, six other parvicursorines are known from more northerly localities within the Santonian to Maastrichtian-aged Upper Cretaceous rocks (Alifanov & Barsbold, 2009; Karhu & Rautian, 1996; Eberth et al, 2009; Gao & Norell, 2000; Jerzykiewicz & Russell, 1991; Lillegraven & McKenna, 1986) of the Mongolian Gobi Basin: Albinykus (Nesbitt et al, 2011), Ceratonykus (Alifanov & Barsbold, 2009), Mononykus (Perle et al, 1994), Parvicursor (Karhu & Rautian, 1996), Shuvuuia (Chiappe, Norell & Clark, 1998) and Kol (Turner, Nesbitt & Norell, 2009) (Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyke and Naish (1) draw attention to three points that they consider to be "serious shortcomings" of our recent paper on a monodactyl nonavian dinosaur (2). Here, we respond to each point in turn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did include this taxon in a section of our paper (albeit in the SI Appendix) dealing with the biogeography of the Alvarezsauroidea, and even discussed its possible systematic position (2). Because it is probably a derived alvarezsauroid deeply nested within an Asian clade (2), it will not affect our biogeographic hypothesis (at best adding another dispersal event from Asia to Europe after the three dispersal events we proposed).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation