1982
DOI: 10.1002/anie.198204321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mononuclear Hydroxoiron(III) Complex of a Porphinoid Ligand System with Bifacial Steric Hindrance

Abstract: Mononuclear hydroxoiron(il1) porphyrins are normally unstable, the ease of condensation of isolated FeOH groups to FeOFe bridges preventing their isolationr2I. Recently, a variety of mononucIear hydroxohemins have been mentioned, the stability of which is attributed to bifacial steric hindrance, i. e. to bulky substituents on both sides of the porphinatoThe published data of these compounds d o not yet allow full characterization.We report here a well-defined mononuclear hydroxoiron(rr1) complex of a porphinoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the distance is longer for Lys heme‐iron coordination in the octaheme tetrathionate reductase from Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1, 2.2 Å[47], and also for the N‐terminal amino coordination in cytochromes f , 2.1 Å[48]. The distance is closer to the Fe‐O distance in Fe‐OH complexes and five coordinate hydroxo‐iron(III) porphyrins ( ≈ 1.9 Å) [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the distance is longer for Lys heme‐iron coordination in the octaheme tetrathionate reductase from Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1, 2.2 Å[47], and also for the N‐terminal amino coordination in cytochromes f , 2.1 Å[48]. The distance is closer to the Fe‐O distance in Fe‐OH complexes and five coordinate hydroxo‐iron(III) porphyrins ( ≈ 1.9 Å) [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[85] As such, they provide ap otential avenue towards ar ich-but as of yet underdeveloped-receptor chemistry up to enantiorecognition. [86] Much like porphyrins,c alixphyrins are basic and bind protons at their imine functions but, intriguingly,t he corresponding dications are more conjugated and thus more stable than the neutral species. [86b] This again highlights the diverse character of calixphyrins as macrocycles with partial traits of both calixphyrins and porphyrins.I np ractical terms,c oreprotonated calix[4]phyrins form in the presence of acids where acid anions are subsequently hydrogen-bonded to the (protonated) core.I ns uch complexes,f or example, 46,t he pyrrole cycles are tilted significantly out of the mean-plane and, depending on the molecular geometry,t he meso-hydrogen atoms can participate in further stabilization of those salts ( Figure 11).…”
Section: Calix[4]phyrins:p Hlorins Porphomethenes and Porphodimethenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structurally most-related complex characterized is Fe(DBPh 2 ) 2 (NH 3 )(Py), in which (DBPh 2 ) 2 is the macrocyclic equatorial ligand bis(dimethyglyoximato-diphenylborylated) (Vernik and Stynes 1996). In this complex, the Fe-NH 3 axial distance is 2.035(5) Å. Mononuclear hydroxoiron(III) porphyrins are normally unstable (Buchler et al 1982), and the only two examples characterized structurally are pentacoordinated complexes, the hydroxo-iron(III) ␣␥ bis(tert-butyl)-octaethyl-␣␥ dihydroporphyrin (Fe-OH ‫ס‬ 1.89(1) Å) (Buchler et al 1982) and the hydroxoiron(III) meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (Haryono et al 1998). Nevertheless, unambiguous assignment of the sixth axial ligand derives from the H-bond network around the heme group of the present high-resolution crystal structure.…”
Section: Molecular Structure Of the Ammonia Adductmentioning
confidence: 99%