2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc01962b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mononuclear nonheme {FeNO}6 complex: synthesis and structural and spectroscopic characterization

Abstract: X-ray structures of nonheme {FeNO}6 and iron(iii)-nitrito complexes bearing a tetraamido macrocyclic ligand are reported along with three different generation pathways.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, whereas ferrous CO complexes are typically diamagnetic, two S = 1 ferrous CO complexes with trigonal-bipyramidal geometries have been isolated. 103,104 Nevertheless, in two other systems with square pyramidal geometries, S = 1 {FeNO} 6 complexes have been proposed 105,106 (although recent spectroscopic data on the TAML compound suggest an S = 0 spin state), 107 indicating that hs-{FeNO} 6 complexes may generally have an S = 1 spin state as observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, whereas ferrous CO complexes are typically diamagnetic, two S = 1 ferrous CO complexes with trigonal-bipyramidal geometries have been isolated. 103,104 Nevertheless, in two other systems with square pyramidal geometries, S = 1 {FeNO} 6 complexes have been proposed 105,106 (although recent spectroscopic data on the TAML compound suggest an S = 0 spin state), 107 indicating that hs-{FeNO} 6 complexes may generally have an S = 1 spin state as observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…However, it should be noted that both 3 and [Fe­(PS3*)­(NO)] are trigonal bipyramidal complexes, which generally favor an S = 1 spin state in d 6 systems due to the degeneracy of the d xz / yz and d x 2– y 2/ xy orbitals in a trigonal ligand field. For example, whereas ferrous CO complexes are typically diamagnetic, two S = 1 ferrous CO complexes with trigonal-bipyramidal geometries have been isolated. , Nevertheless, in two other systems with square pyramidal geometries, S = 1 {FeNO} 6 complexes have been proposed , (although recent spectroscopic data on the TAML compound suggest an S = 0 spin state), indicating that hs-{FeNO} 6 complexes may generally have an S = 1 spin state as observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lippard and coworker reported the 5C complex [Fe­(TAML)­(NO)] − (TAML = tetra­amidomacrocyclic ligand tetraanion), which bears a close to linear Fe–N–O bond (with an angle of 172°) and an N–O stretching frequency of 1797 cm –1 . Initially, this complex was proposed to have an S t = 1 ground state, but it was later shown by Nam and coworkers that this complex is in fact diamagnetic, and hence, of ls-{FeNO} 6 type . Surprisingly, [Fe­(TAML)­(NO)] − can reversibly bind NO when purged with N 2 , which is a rare property for non-heme FeNO complexes.…”
Section: Non-heme Iron Centers and Nomentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The v no stretch of observed for 9 (1667 cm −1 ) and 10 (1687 cm −1 ) is also significantly lower than the characteristic range for sixand even five-coordinate {Fe(NO)} 6 complexes. 6972 In addition, the especially low Fe-N-O angles (150.9(2)° in 9 and 154.4(1)° in 10 ) are closer to the range of the more electron rich {Fe(NO)} 7 complexes, 73 where either the Fe(II)-NO• radical or Fe(III)-NO-description would be more appropriate. This description, coupled with the fact that both complexes are diamagnetic, suggests that the PDI ligand is also likely a monoradical (see computations below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%