2016
DOI: 10.1515/mms-2016-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo-Based Method for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty in the Training and Use of Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: When an artificial neural network is used to determine the value of a physical quantity its result is usually presented without an uncertainty. This is due to the difficulty in determining the uncertainties related to the neural model. However, the result of a measurement can be considered valid only with its respective measurement uncertainty. Therefore, this article proposes a method of obtaining reliable results by measuring systems that use artificial neural networks. For this, it considers the Monte Carlo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we used 𝐵 = 12 input quantities 𝑋 1...𝐵 = {𝑝 D , 𝑝 S , ReΓ D , ImΓ D , ReΓ S , ImΓ S , Re𝐸 𝑅 , Im𝐸 𝑅 , Re𝐸 S , Im𝐸 S , Re𝐸 D , Im𝐸 D } in the measurement function (4). For each 𝑓 1...𝑘 correlation matrix of size 𝐵 × 𝐵 was calculated using the Cholesky factorization with the Octave chol function [18], and the correlation degree between input quantities was checked by finding the number of instances of statistically significant (𝛼 < 0.005) correlation using the Octave corrcoef function [18], which is shown in Table 3 as numbers.…”
Section: Validation Of the MCM Software On Example Of Determining Typ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we used 𝐵 = 12 input quantities 𝑋 1...𝐵 = {𝑝 D , 𝑝 S , ReΓ D , ImΓ D , ReΓ S , ImΓ S , Re𝐸 𝑅 , Im𝐸 𝑅 , Re𝐸 S , Im𝐸 S , Re𝐸 D , Im𝐸 D } in the measurement function (4). For each 𝑓 1...𝑘 correlation matrix of size 𝐵 × 𝐵 was calculated using the Cholesky factorization with the Octave chol function [18], and the correlation degree between input quantities was checked by finding the number of instances of statistically significant (𝛼 < 0.005) correlation using the Octave corrcoef function [18], which is shown in Table 3 as numbers.…”
Section: Validation Of the MCM Software On Example Of Determining Typ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCM has an advantage over the GUM when the estimated uncertainty of measurement consists mainly of measurement errors with a PDF significantly deviating from the normal distribution and/or when it is determined from a small number 𝑛 of measurement samples. The low popularity of the MCM was due to the need to use multiple (up to 10 6 ) samples of measured quantities with appropriately chosen PDF distributions, but with the currently available computing power of personal computers, the estimation of uncertainty interval at 𝑝 = 95% confidence level usually takes a few seconds, so the MCM is now growing in popularity [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auto-associative neural networks are essentially multi-layered perceptrons (MLPs) [6,[27][28] that are trained by presenting to the network target vectors equal to the training ones, i.e. the network is expected to produce the input at its output.…”
Section: Auto-associative Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%