2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38611-w
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo feasibility study for neutron based real-time range verification in proton therapy

Abstract: Uncertainties in the proton range in tissue during proton therapy limit the precision in treatment delivery. These uncertainties result in expanded treatment margins, thereby increasing radiation dose to healthy tissue. Real-time range verification techniques aim to reduce these uncertainties in order to take full advantage of the finite range of the primary protons. In this paper, we propose a novel concept for real-time range verification based on detection of secondary neutrons produced in nuclear interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if the difference in the depth dose distribution between PENH and TOPAS were originated on the assumed neutron local deposition done by PENH, both curves should coincide at the Bragg peak depth, where neutron production becomes nearly zero. 52 The origin of this discrepancy can be explained by differences in the modeling of elastic collisions and inelastic collisions, and differences in the transport used in PENH and TOPAS, whose consequences appear magnified by the small bin size employed at the central axis. This is evident from the fact that a few millimeters away from the central beam axis the dose distributions from PENH and TOPAS nearly coincide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the difference in the depth dose distribution between PENH and TOPAS were originated on the assumed neutron local deposition done by PENH, both curves should coincide at the Bragg peak depth, where neutron production becomes nearly zero. 52 The origin of this discrepancy can be explained by differences in the modeling of elastic collisions and inelastic collisions, and differences in the transport used in PENH and TOPAS, whose consequences appear magnified by the small bin size employed at the central axis. This is evident from the fact that a few millimeters away from the central beam axis the dose distributions from PENH and TOPAS nearly coincide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prompt gamma (PG) monitoring allows a proper assessment of the distal dose falloff of the proton beam during the treatment 4 . Unlike the produced positron emitters 5 or neutrons 6 , the spatial distribution of the emitted prompt gamma rays shows a very close correlation with the proton dose distribution at the end of the beam 7 . Moreover, these gamma rays are prompt, which means that they are emitted within 1 ns after the collision, which is key for the online verification of the proton range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For these ancillary simulations, we used the same physics models and distance between the S-and A-planes of i-TED as before. Each MC event (S&A coincidence) contains the same eight features determined with the detector in a real measurement: 3D coordinates of the γ-ray interactions in the two PSDs (6), energy deposited in the S-and A-planes (E s , E a ) (2). The energy and position resolutions of the detector were included as described before.…”
Section: Machine-learning Aided Full-energy Event Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this framework, the measurement and calculation of TCS of a vast set of materials are challenging tasks, owing to the several non-trivial dependencies on the molecular structure, dynamics, and thermodynamic temperature. When the TCS calculation is applied to human tissues or muscles for applications such as Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) 41,42 as well as to study secondary neutrons-emission induced during proton therapy 43,44 , the possibility to reconstruct the cross section of large proteins becomes challenging. In fact, the 20 basic amino acids can combine to form tens of thousands 45 up to several billions of proteins 46 , making the task of either calculate or measure the entire set of related TCS unrealistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%