2003
DOI: 10.1021/ac025973r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo Program for Quantitative Electron-Induced X-ray Analysis of Individual Particles

Abstract: A versatile Monte Carlo program for quantitative particle analysis in electron probe X-ray microanalysis is presented. The program includes routines for simulating electron-solid interactions in microparticles lying on a flat surface and calculating the generated X-ray signal. Simulation of the whole X-ray spectrum as well as phi(z) curves is possible. The most important facility of the program is the reverse Monte Carlo quantification of the chemical composition of microparticles, including low-Z elements, su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis or electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) yields spatially resolved chemical composition of individual particles Katrinak et al, 1992). One general limitation of EDX is that quantitative analysis of low-Z elements (carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen) is not always possible and requires time-intensive Monte-Carlo calculations (Ro et al, 2003(Ro et al, , 2004. TEM imaging with EELS can be used to characterize carbon content of particles, but its limited energy resolution precludes detailed analysis of carbon bonding (Katrinak et al, 1992).…”
Section: R C Moffet Et Al: Microscopic Characterization Of Carbonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis or electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) yields spatially resolved chemical composition of individual particles Katrinak et al, 1992). One general limitation of EDX is that quantitative analysis of low-Z elements (carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen) is not always possible and requires time-intensive Monte-Carlo calculations (Ro et al, 2003(Ro et al, , 2004. TEM imaging with EELS can be used to characterize carbon content of particles, but its limited energy resolution precludes detailed analysis of carbon bonding (Katrinak et al, 1992).…”
Section: R C Moffet Et Al: Microscopic Characterization Of Carbonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net characteristic X-ray intensities of chemical elements were evaluated by a nonlinear leastsquares fitting using the AXIL programme (Vekemans et al, 1994). A Monte Carlo simulation with successive approximation was used for quantification (Ro et al, 2003). The elemental quantification procedure provided results with an accuracy of within 12% relative deviations between the calculated and nominal elemental concentrations for the standard particles (Ro et al, 2000(Ro et al, , 2001.…”
Section: Data Measurement and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The elemental concentrations of the individual particles were determined from their X-ray intensities by the application of a Monte Carlo calculation combined with reverse successive approximations. 31,33 The quantification procedure provided results with an accuracy of within 12% relative deviation between the calculated and nominal elemental concentrations for various standard particles. 33 The low-Z particle EPMA method can provide quantitative information on the chemical compositions, and particles can be classified based on their chemical species.…”
Section: Edxrfmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…31,33 The quantification procedure provided results with an accuracy of within 12% relative deviation between the calculated and nominal elemental concentrations for various standard particles. 33 The low-Z particle EPMA method can provide quantitative information on the chemical compositions, and particles can be classified based on their chemical species. The analytical procedure for determining the chemical species of individual particles and assigning those particles to specific types is described in more detail elsewhere.…”
Section: Edxrfmentioning
confidence: 96%