2010
DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2010.488098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Ability Estimation in Item Response Theory with Speeded Computer Adaptive Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…B. Chang et al, 2014, Schmitt et al, 2010oder van der Linden, 2011. Diese sogenannten Response-Time-Modelle, die im Rahmen von hierarchischen Modellen Anwendung finden, benötigen jedoch individuelle Zeitangaben zu den jeweiligen Testpersonen, die in der vorliegenden Untersuchung nicht miterhoben wurden.…”
Section: Item-und Reliabilitätsanalyseunclassified
“…B. Chang et al, 2014, Schmitt et al, 2010oder van der Linden, 2011. Diese sogenannten Response-Time-Modelle, die im Rahmen von hierarchischen Modellen Anwendung finden, benötigen jedoch individuelle Zeitangaben zu den jeweiligen Testpersonen, die in der vorliegenden Untersuchung nicht miterhoben wurden.…”
Section: Item-und Reliabilitätsanalyseunclassified
“…Some recent studies have examined time pressure on exams, moving beyond analysis of simple omit and not reached behaviors, to include speed of responding at different points during the test (Bridgeman & Cline, 2004;Talento-Miller & Guo, 2009). Aside from the known benefits of computer administration in the tracking of response time, however, there are criticisms of CAT that suggest that differences in item difficulty across examinees may also lead to differences in test time (Chang, 2007;Lu & Sireci, 2007;Guo, 2011;Schmitt, Sass, Sullivan, & Walker, 2010). The possible difference in time required by item difficulty underscores the importance of assessing differences in speed while controlling for examinee's proficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%