2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2019)061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte-Carlo simulation of double parton scattering

Abstract: In this work, a new Monte-Carlo simulation of double parton scattering (DPS) at parton level is presented. The simulation is based on the QCD framework developed recently by M. Diehl, J. R. Gaunt and K. Schönwald. With this framework, the dynamics of the 1 → 2 perturbative splittings is consistently included inside the simulation, with the impact-parameter dependence taken into account. The simulation evolves simultaneously two hard systems from a common hard scale down to the hadronic scale. The evolution is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(374 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there are sum rules [77,78], which involve DPDs integrated over y (or evaluated at Δ = 0) and express the conservation of momentum and quark number. So far, only a small number of studies [2,77,[79][80][81] have used these sum rule to constrain DPDs, and it is the goal of the present paper to continue this line of work. Whereas the DPD models in [2,77,79,80] are formulated for DPDs at Δ = 0, we work with DPDs in y space, because these are the quantities required for computing DPS cross sections in the formalism of [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are sum rules [77,78], which involve DPDs integrated over y (or evaluated at Δ = 0) and express the conservation of momentum and quark number. So far, only a small number of studies [2,77,[79][80][81] have used these sum rule to constrain DPDs, and it is the goal of the present paper to continue this line of work. Whereas the DPD models in [2,77,79,80] are formulated for DPDs at Δ = 0, we work with DPDs in y space, because these are the quantities required for computing DPS cross sections in the formalism of [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, there can be non-perturbative correlations between the parton momentum fractions and y in the dPDFs, and correlations in spin, colour and flavour between partons [5,73] (for a review, see [74]). All of these types of effects can lead to differences in the DPS rate and/or DPS shapes (for examples of these, see [8,70,[75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]), where effects on the DPS shapes are particularly important with regards to the correct experimental extraction of DPS contributions.…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to this algorithm as dShower. In a previous work [79] we developed a parton-shower description of the DPS term, with proper account of the y dependence and 1 → 2 splitting effects, and a cut-off on the y integral ∼ 1/ν ∼ 1/Q h . That is, we recast the first core aspect of the DGS framework into a parton-shower description.…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)012mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A retuning of the hadronization/FF parameters would have consequences even over the MPI parameters. The simplest case of MPI is Dual Parton Scattering, and considerable theoretical efforts have been performed to develop rigorous descriptions of the latter [15,16], beyond the phenomenological pocket formula often used; it might be interesting to bridge the gap by applying more rigorous procedures to estimate the DPS contribution in the phenomenological analyses of heavy-flavour hadroproduction. Third, it is useful including higher-order corrections: the uncertainty band related to (µ R , µ F ) scale variation, not shown in Fig.…”
Section: Pos(radcor2019)048mentioning
confidence: 99%