Economic Structural Change 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06824-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects of Structural Breaks on Tests for Unit Roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption, however, may be violated in the presence of financial liberalization since this process is often regarded as generating structural change (Pradhan and Subramanian 2003). Hendry and Neale (1991) have shown that (i) regime shifts/structural change can mimic unit roots in stationary autoregressive time series, (ii) each shift is very hard to detect using conventional parameter constancy tests.…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption, however, may be violated in the presence of financial liberalization since this process is often regarded as generating structural change (Pradhan and Subramanian 2003). Hendry and Neale (1991) have shown that (i) regime shifts/structural change can mimic unit roots in stationary autoregressive time series, (ii) each shift is very hard to detect using conventional parameter constancy tests.…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is well known that it can be dif¿cult to distinguish between deterministic shifts and unit roots in linear L +4, systems (see for example Perron, 1989, Rappoport and Reichlin, 1989, Hendry and Neale, 1991, and Campos, Ericsson and Hendry, 1996. Hence statistics for testing parameter constancy have important roles to play in evaluating the relative merits of alternative models for time series variables which might be subject to regime shifts, and in assessing whether conditions required for the valid application of procedures such as that of Johansen (1988) are satis¿ed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying Autometrics with the theory variables forced to be retained, but selecting the dynamic reactions, has almost no impact on the match of the theory and evidence, the fit of the model, the coefficient magnitudes and their standard errors, or the lack of cointegration. Selection simply eliminates insignificant lagged variables: The finding of no cointegration with 'wrong signs', and an estimated lagged dependent variable coefficient close to unity, are consistent with unit roots 'capturing' breaks that are not dealt with directly (see inter alia Perron, 1989, Hendry and Neale, 1991, and Banerjee, Lumsdaine and Stock, 1992. There is a vast improvement in the coherence of the theory and evidence, with the anticipated signs on long-run elasticities, and cointegration is clearly indicated.…”
Section: Dynamic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Breaks matter greatly for food demand in a world subject to unanticipated shifts due to health scares, major wars, and the introduction of policy programs like food relief. Indeed not modelling breaks can result in estimated models exhibiting unit roots when none are there (see inter alia, Perron, 1989 andNeale, 1991). Outliers arise both from sudden behavioural shifts (scares over the safety of apples from alar; mercury in swordfish, salmonella in eggs, etc.…”
Section: Modelling With Data Revisions and Breaksmentioning
confidence: 99%