1994
DOI: 10.1118/1.597194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo study of accelerator head scatter

Abstract: The production of off-focus x rays in the head of a 6 MV linac has been investigated using the EGS4 Monte Carlo code. The purpose of the study was to identify the sources of off-focus radiation and the relative contribution for each source. Even though a particular energy and linac were modeled, the broad conclusions are expected to be general since the effects of head scatter are similar for most conventional head designs, regardless of manufacturer, energy, and model. The head components that were modeled in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The filter is a major contributor of scattered radiation in the treatment head (Chaney et al 1994, Fix et al 2001 and can lead to higher doses outside the treatment field , Kry et al 2010, O'Brien et al 1991.. Due to the non-uniform shape of the flattening filter, the beam energy distribution will vary with off-axis distance, creating challenges for dose calculation algorithms. One way of removing these unfavourable properties of conventional clinical radiation beams would be to remove the flattening filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filter is a major contributor of scattered radiation in the treatment head (Chaney et al 1994, Fix et al 2001 and can lead to higher doses outside the treatment field , Kry et al 2010, O'Brien et al 1991.. Due to the non-uniform shape of the flattening filter, the beam energy distribution will vary with off-axis distance, creating challenges for dose calculation algorithms. One way of removing these unfavourable properties of conventional clinical radiation beams would be to remove the flattening filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the simulations were performed at the open field geometry conditions, which corresponds to a 5ϫ40 cm 2 field at an 85 cm surface to source distance, except where stated otherwise. Scoring regions for depth dose calculations were 10ϫ10 ϫ5 mm 3 . The average spectra were scored in the central 4 ϫ40 cm 2 area, except for the off-axis dependence where the scoring regions were 4ϫ5 cm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, application of Monte Carlo simulation has experienced tremendous growth, particularly in studying clinical accelerators. [13][14][15][16] This is because Monte Carlo simulation enables us to study the accelerator at a greater depth in identifying individual sources of the backscatter from collimator jaws. The motivation for this work is to model the backscattered radiation as functions of the upper ͑Y͒ and lower ͑X͒ jaw positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%