1998
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A More Expansive View of International Business

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of organizations include entire entities such as multinational enterprises, corporations, and firms, as well as parts of these organizations, such as establishments, business units, subsidiaries, and geographies. b See Toyne and Nigh (1998).…”
Section: System-level Dividesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of organizations include entire entities such as multinational enterprises, corporations, and firms, as well as parts of these organizations, such as establishments, business units, subsidiaries, and geographies. b See Toyne and Nigh (1998).…”
Section: System-level Dividesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put differently, we assert the need to move internationalization theorizing beyond the positivist position that considers reality and person as objective and independent domains. Here we join the plea for an ontological and epistemological renewal in the field (Sullivan, 1998;Sullivan & Daniels, 2008;Toyne & Nigh, 1998). What is envisioned here is that at the same time reality is dependent upon subjective interpretation, it is also objective in the sense that it is inter-subjectively negotiated, shared and sustained (Berger & Luckmann, 1966;Sandberg & Targama, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…What distinguishes the quest for methods from the attainment phase is a stand regarding a general theory that could provide a clear parameter of culture -scholars in the quest for methods phase did not have it and were actively searching for it -and scholars in the attainment phase, at least those positioned in the mainstream of the field, assume that they have it and therefore have focused their efforts on issues of methodology. As the international management field moved through the quest for methods and attainment phases, the emphasis on these issues fluctuated according to the degree to which scholars within the field have attempted to find out what is the field's raison d'être (e.g., Toyne & Nigh, 1998). During the quest for methods phase, scholars focused on developing a science of culture that could allow the comparison of managerial practices among different nations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%