2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2007.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Morita type equivalence for dual operator algebras

Abstract: We generalize the main theorem of Rieffel for Morita equivalence of W * -algebras to the case of unital dual operator algebras: two unital dual operator algebras A, B have completely isometric normal representations α, β such that α(A) = [M * β(B)M] −w * and β(B) = [Mα(A)M * ] −w * for a ternary ring of operators M (i.e. a linear space M such that MM * M ⊂ M) if and only if there exists an equivalence functor F : A M → B M which "extends" to a * -functor implementing an equivalence between the categories A DM … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove that two unital dual operator algebras A, B are stably isomorphic if and only if they are ∆-equivalent [7], if and only if they have completely isometric normal representations α, β on Hilbert spaces H, K respectively and there exists a ternary ring of operators M ⊂ B(H, K) such that α(A) = [M * β(B)M] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We prove that two unital dual operator algebras A, B are stably isomorphic if and only if they are ∆-equivalent [7], if and only if they have completely isometric normal representations α, β on Hilbert spaces H, K respectively and there exists a ternary ring of operators M ⊂ B(H, K) such that α(A) = [M * β(B)M] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] the notion of ∆-equivalence of two unital dual operator algebras A, B was defined in terms of equivalence of two appropriate categories. In the present paper, we will adopt the following definition of ∆-equivalence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carefully computing the first, and then the second, commutants of L w (as in 8.5.32 in [8] or [22]), and using the double commutant theorem, gives the result. coincides also with the equivalence of [17,18,20], that is, weak* stable isomorphism. Indeed if (M, N, X, Y) is a weak* Morita context, then it is clearly a strong Morita context in this case.…”
Section: Proposition 39 Weak* Morita Equivalence Is An Equivalence mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Then the weak linking algebra of such an example is Morita equivalent in the same sense to A (see Section 4), but they are probably not always weak* stably isomorphic. (10) A beautiful example from [19] (formerly part of [17]): two 'similar' separably acting nest algebras are clearly weakly Morita equivalent by the facts presented around [19, Theorem 3.5] (Davidson's similarity theorem), indeed in this case the 'subcontext' (see Definition 3.2) equals the 'context', and the algebras are even strongly Morita equivalent. However, Eleftherakis shows they need not be '∆-equivalent' (that is, weak* stably isomorphic [20]).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation