1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900004785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphemic measure of early language development: data from modern Hebrew

Abstract: Given the nature of Hebrew as a highly synthetic language with rich bound morphology, an attempt was made to establish a measure corresponding to the MLU for a language such as English. The method of calculating MPU (morpheme-per-utterance) which is described here was tried out on 38 Hebrew-speaking children aged 2;0 to 3;0, and measured for internal consistency against different types of elicitation procedures, and for validity by comparison with the subjects' performance on a specially-devised measure of syn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
1
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MLU in morphemes calculated according to the system adapted for Hebrew by Dromi and Berman (1982), and revised by Levy (1995). MLU in morphemes calculated according to the system adapted for Hebrew by Dromi and Berman (1982), and revised by Levy (1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLU in morphemes calculated according to the system adapted for Hebrew by Dromi and Berman (1982), and revised by Levy (1995). MLU in morphemes calculated according to the system adapted for Hebrew by Dromi and Berman (1982), and revised by Levy (1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 for intervals). All the sessions were recorded with either audio (40%) or video 519 Brown (1973) and Dromi & Berman's (1982) methodology. b Duration of each session was 60 to 90 minutes.…”
Section: Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of Words per Clause (WPC) provides a straightforward and reliable measure of syntactic density by specifying how many lexico-grammatical elements are combined within the boundaries of each clause, hence how much information is packaged within a single clause. This measure, in a way comparable to use of MLU (mean length of utterance) in early child language (Brown 1973;Dromi & Berman 1982) requires (a) agreed definition of what is meant by 'a word' for the particular purpose at hand (Berman 2002) and (b) well-motivated specification of clause boundaries as the basis for dividing each text into clauses.…”
Section:  Words Per Clause As a Key To Syntactic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%