2013
DOI: 10.26879/342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphotype catalog and paleoenvironmental interpretations of early Miocene fossil leaves from the Hiwegi Formation, Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya

Abstract: Early Miocene deposits on Rusinga Island (Lake Victoria, Kenya) contain an abundance of faunal and floral remains. Despite the attention that has historically been given to the early Miocene fauna from Rusinga Island, little attention has been given to the early Miocene fossil floras and to date no studies have described fossil leaf morphotypes from Rusinga Island. Here, we present a morphotype catalog of fossil leaves collected from the Grit Member of the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island. We describe 14 mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reconstruct the NG15 interval as an open canopy environment, ranging from an open riparian woodland to a wooded grassland biome. This is similar to, though perhaps more open than, environmental reconstructions for the Grit Member and lower Fossil Bed Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which are reconstructed as a patchwork of woodland and forested biomes within a riparian habitat in a warm and highly seasonal climate in which evaporitic conditions were recurrent (Collinson et al, 2009;Conrad et al, 2013;Maxbauer et al, 2013). Likewise, the interpretations for the NG15 interval are considerably different from the paleoenvironmental reconstruction for the Kibanga Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which is reconstructed to be a closed-canopy, tropical seasonal forest (Michel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Comparison To Paleoenvironments Of the Hiwegi Formation On Rsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We reconstruct the NG15 interval as an open canopy environment, ranging from an open riparian woodland to a wooded grassland biome. This is similar to, though perhaps more open than, environmental reconstructions for the Grit Member and lower Fossil Bed Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which are reconstructed as a patchwork of woodland and forested biomes within a riparian habitat in a warm and highly seasonal climate in which evaporitic conditions were recurrent (Collinson et al, 2009;Conrad et al, 2013;Maxbauer et al, 2013). Likewise, the interpretations for the NG15 interval are considerably different from the paleoenvironmental reconstruction for the Kibanga Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which is reconstructed to be a closed-canopy, tropical seasonal forest (Michel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Comparison To Paleoenvironments Of the Hiwegi Formation On Rsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Perhaps the most conspicuous difference between Karungu and the Hiwegi Formation is the rarity of primate taxa at Karungu, in comparison to the relatively common primates found in the Hiwegi Formation. Coupled with evidence for variability in paleoenvironment and paleovegetation through the deposits at Karungu and through the Hiwegi Formation (e.g., this study; Collinson et al, 2009;Maxbauer et al, 2013;Michel et al, 2014;Driese et al, 2016), the differences in the faunal abundance and occurrences between Karungu and Rusinga Island are likely related to true faunal differences, possibly as a result of paleoenvironment differences.…”
Section: Comparison To Paleoenvironments Of the Hiwegi Formation On Rsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, however, Early Miocene records of carnivorans in the Turkana Basin are scarce (Savage, 1965;Anyonge, 1991;Werdelin and Peigné, 2010;Leakey et al, 2011;, and little material has been described. Currently known carnivorans from West Turkana include representatives of genera and species also present elsewhere, particularly in the Hiwegi Formation of Rusinga Island, western Kenya (Collinson et al, 2009;Maxbauer et al, 2013) (Figure 2 1). Rusinga has a time-averaged collection sampling different localities ranging approximately between 20 Ma and 17 Ma (Peppe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%