2017
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mouse model for pain and neuroplastic changes associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be one of the deadliest human malignancies and is associated with excruciating pain, which is a serious complication and severely impacts the quality of life in patients. In human patients, poor survival prognosis is linked to remarkable remodeling of intrapancreatic nerves, which, in turn, is correlated to increased pain intensity. Understanding mechanisms underlying pain associated with PDAC has been hampered by the lack of animal models which replicate al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies addressed the specific regulatory role of PNI in cancer‐associated pain through several animal models. For example, a PDAC orthotopic K8484 mouse model showed the main characteristics of human PDAC, including the structural remodeling of histopathology and nerve fibers [ 117 ]. In vivo methods to quantify pain or hypersensitivity are important to understanding the molecular mechanism of pain and its impact on the process of PDAC [ 117 ].…”
Section: Clinical Significance Of Pnimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent studies addressed the specific regulatory role of PNI in cancer‐associated pain through several animal models. For example, a PDAC orthotopic K8484 mouse model showed the main characteristics of human PDAC, including the structural remodeling of histopathology and nerve fibers [ 117 ]. In vivo methods to quantify pain or hypersensitivity are important to understanding the molecular mechanism of pain and its impact on the process of PDAC [ 117 ].…”
Section: Clinical Significance Of Pnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a PDAC orthotopic K8484 mouse model showed the main characteristics of human PDAC, including the structural remodeling of histopathology and nerve fibers [ 117 ]. In vivo methods to quantify pain or hypersensitivity are important to understanding the molecular mechanism of pain and its impact on the process of PDAC [ 117 ]. Of note, PHA‐848125, a dual inhibitor of cyclin‐dependent kinase and NTRK1, has been tested in preclinical trials to suppress PNI and alleviated pain generation in human PDAC cancer cells (BXPC3, MiaPACA2, and CAPAN1) in a xenograft mouse model [ 118 ].…”
Section: Clinical Significance Of Pnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orthotopic mouse model of PDAC involving K8484 cells injection in C57BL/6 mice was employed as described previously. 10 Antibodies neutralizing CCL21 (10 mg/injection; or control IgG; twice weekly), CXCL10 (30 mg/injection; or control monoclonal IgG 2A; twice weekly), CCR7 (4 mg/injection; or control IgG; every other day), or a CXCR3 antagonist AMG487 (0.4 mg/injection; or vehicle; every other day) were injected intraperitoneally (Supplementary Table 1) for the duration specified in the Results.…”
Section: Neutralization Of Ccl21 Cxcl10 Ccr7 or Cxcr3 In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous pain behavior is one of the most difficult components of cancer pain to manage and is therefore the most consistent end point against which the efficacy of a candidate drug is tested. The major limitation to using spontaneous pain as the end point is that the methodology differs substantially in the literature; spontaneous cancerrelated pain has been measured indirectly using hunching (Lindsay et al, 2005a;Sevcik et al, 2006;Stopczynski et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2017;Kajiwara et al, 2020), open field activity (Stopczynski et al, 2014;Selvaraj et al, 2017;Hirth et al, 2020), home cage activity (Selvaraj et al, 2017;Hirth et al, 2020), voluntary wheel running (Selvaraj et al, 2017), vocalizations (Lindsay et al, 2005a;Sevcik et al, 2006), conditioned place preference (Selvaraj et al, 2017) as well as impressions of appearance [e.g., grimace scale (Kajiwara et al, 2020), coat condition (Roughan et al, 2004a)]. While many of these (King et al, 2007;King et al, 2008;Hald et al, 2009b;Ungard et al, 2014;Gdowski et al, 2017;Remeniuk et al,…”
Section: Cancer-related Nociceptive Behavior Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home cage activity, open field activity, hunching, vocalizations, grimace, wheel running, CPP (Selvaraj et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017) CIPN Mechanical Von frey, randall-selitto (Casals-Diaz et al, 2009;Han et al, 2018;Kyte et al, 2018;Laumet et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2019;Shahid et al, 2019;Bruna et al, 2020) Thermal Hargreaves, hot plate, acetone, cold plantar test (Chine et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Shahid et al, 2019;Tonello et al, 2019;Bruna et al, 2020) Functioninduced Sensory and motor nerve conduction, functional autonomic tests, rota-rod, gait analysis (Liu et al, 2018;Laumet et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Bruna et al, 2020)…”
Section: Spontaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%