1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09742.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mouse Model of Transplacental Cocaine Exposure: Clinical Implications for Exposed Infants and Childrena

Abstract: To characterize the effects of cocaine on developing brain we have developed a mouse model of gestational cocaine exposure. We studied pregnant dams injected twice daily with cocaine HCl at 40, 20, or 10 mg/kg/day sc from embryonic days (E)8 to E17 (COC 40, COC20, and COC10, respectively), vehicle-injected dams allowed access to food ad libitum (SAL) or pair-fed with the COC 40 dams (SPF 40), animals pretreated with the short-acting alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine prior to each cocaine injection (P CO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the indirect effects of compromised nutrition and oxygenation resulting from cocaine-induced vasoconstriction of placental vessels, 20 as well as direct effects of cocaine on cell division, cell migration and neurotransmitter function within the developing brain. [21][22][23] The latter possibility is supported by findings of microcerebral dysgenesis in rodents exposed to cocaine, who also exhibit decreased head growth. 24 Our finding that impaired fetal head growth is independent of effects on somatic growth supports the hypothesis that cocaine acts directly to inhibit fetal brain growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These include the indirect effects of compromised nutrition and oxygenation resulting from cocaine-induced vasoconstriction of placental vessels, 20 as well as direct effects of cocaine on cell division, cell migration and neurotransmitter function within the developing brain. [21][22][23] The latter possibility is supported by findings of microcerebral dysgenesis in rodents exposed to cocaine, who also exhibit decreased head growth. 24 Our finding that impaired fetal head growth is independent of effects on somatic growth supports the hypothesis that cocaine acts directly to inhibit fetal brain growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the data remains elusive as to the independent contribution of prenatal cocaine vs. confounding variables such as poly-drug use, poor prenatal; care, adverse living situations, and compromised maternal health in contributing to adverse postnatal neuro-behavioral outcomes. To control for some of these variables we created an animal model of prenatal cocaine exposure which has provided support for the role of cocaine independently contributing to some but not all of the clinical findings (reviewed in (10)). Of note,, rodents exposed to cocaine in utero display an altered response to drugs of abuse when tested as adults including impaired conditioned place preference (11,12), increased acquisition to (13,14) and enhanced reinforcing ability of cocaine (13,14) in self-administration tests, augmented brain stimulation reward following administration of cocaine and D 1 agonists (15), and enhanced stereotypy during cocaine induced behavioral sensitization (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the pathophysiology of cocaine's effect on the central nervous system (CNS) (Eyler & Behnke, 1999;Fetters & Tronick, 1996;Kosofsky & Wilkins, 1998;Mayes, 1994;Mayes, Granger, Frank, Schottenfeld, & Bornstein, 1993;Mirochnick, Meyer, Cole, Herren, & Zuckerman, 1991;Needlman, Zuckerman, Anderson, Mirochnick, & Cohen, 1993;Volpe, 1992), one might expect intrauterine cocaine exposure to have specific, permanent effects on infant motor functioning as well as on affect, attention, and arousal. Additionally, in utero exposure to cocaine also may indirectly affect infant outcome via the maternal fetal cardiovascular system with its resultant fetal hypoxic effects (Lester, LaGasse, & Bigsby, 1998;Lester & Tronick, 1994;Livesay, Ehrlich, & Finnegan, 1987;Villar, Smeriglio, Martorell, Brown, & Klein, 1984;Zuckerman, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%