2001
DOI: 10.1137/s1064827599364428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Moving Mesh Method for One-dimensional Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

Abstract: We develop an adaptive method for solving one-dimensional systems of hyperbolic conservation laws that employs a high resolution Godunov-type scheme for the physical equations, in conjunction with a moving mesh PDE governing the motion of the spatial grid points. Many other moving mesh methods developed to solve hyperbolic problems use a fully implicit discretization for the coupled solution-mesh equations, and so suffer from a significant degree of numerical stiffness. We employ a semi-implicit approach that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful implementation of the adaptive strategy can increase the accuracy of the numerical approximations and also decrease the computational cost. In the past two decades, there has been important progress in developing mesh methods for PDEs, including the variational approach of Winslow [36], Brackbill [5], and Brackbill and Saltzman [6]; finite element methods by Miller and Miller [25] and Davis and Flaherty [11]; the moving mesh PDEs of Cao, Huang, and Russell [7], Stockie, Mackenzie, and Russell [33], Li and Petzold [23], and Ceniceros and Hou [8]; and moving mesh methods based on harmonic mapping of Dvinsky [12] and Li, Tang, and Zhang [21,22]. In the variational approach, the mesh map is provided by the minimizer of a functional of the following form: (2.3) where ∇ := (∂ x1 , ∂ x2 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful implementation of the adaptive strategy can increase the accuracy of the numerical approximations and also decrease the computational cost. In the past two decades, there has been important progress in developing mesh methods for PDEs, including the variational approach of Winslow [36], Brackbill [5], and Brackbill and Saltzman [6]; finite element methods by Miller and Miller [25] and Davis and Flaherty [11]; the moving mesh PDEs of Cao, Huang, and Russell [7], Stockie, Mackenzie, and Russell [33], Li and Petzold [23], and Ceniceros and Hou [8]; and moving mesh methods based on harmonic mapping of Dvinsky [12] and Li, Tang, and Zhang [21,22]. In the variational approach, the mesh map is provided by the minimizer of a functional of the following form: (2.3) where ∇ := (∂ x1 , ∂ x2 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Mackenzie and R. D. Russell [6] to provide a better resolution of wave structures, in particular of contact discontinuities, in comparison with fixed mesh computations.…”
Section: The Eulerian Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason of these discontinue grids comes from the use of adaptive F. X. Hu methods [1] [2] [3] [4], where a grid is abruptly refined in order to gain highresolution solution around areas of large solution variation. In this approach, many fine grids are distributed on those regions where high resolution is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%